bb6df0804b
I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.
- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals by a factor of
70 under llvm/ in terms of their usage.
- The elimination of StringRef::equals brings StringRef closer to
std::string_view, which has operator== but not equals.
- S == "foo" is more readable than S.equals("foo"), especially for
!Long.Expression.equals("str") vs Long.Expression != "str".
32 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
32 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
//===- lib/MC/MCSymbolXCOFF.cpp - XCOFF Code Symbol Representation --------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/MC/MCSectionXCOFF.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
MCSectionXCOFF *MCSymbolXCOFF::getRepresentedCsect() const {
|
|
assert(RepresentedCsect &&
|
|
"Trying to get csect representation of this symbol but none was set.");
|
|
assert(getSymbolTableName() == RepresentedCsect->getSymbolTableName() &&
|
|
"SymbolTableNames need to be the same for this symbol and its csect "
|
|
"representation.");
|
|
return RepresentedCsect;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MCSymbolXCOFF::setRepresentedCsect(MCSectionXCOFF *C) {
|
|
assert(C && "Assigned csect should not be null.");
|
|
assert((!RepresentedCsect || RepresentedCsect == C) &&
|
|
"Trying to set a csect that doesn't match the one that this symbol is "
|
|
"already mapped to.");
|
|
assert(getSymbolTableName() == C->getSymbolTableName() &&
|
|
"SymbolTableNames need to be the same for this symbol and its csect "
|
|
"representation.");
|
|
RepresentedCsect = C;
|
|
}
|