
The idea behind this heuristic is that normally the visitor is there to inform the user that a certain function may fail to initialize a certain out-parameter. For system header functions this is usually dictated by the contract, and it's unlikely that the header function has accidentally forgot to put the value into the out-parameter; it's more likely that the user has intentionally skipped the error check. Warnings on skipped error checks are more like security warnings; they aren't necessarily useful for all users, and they should instead be introduced on a per-API basis. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60107 llvm-svn: 357810
18 lines
231 B
C++
18 lines
231 B
C++
#pragma clang system_header
|
|
|
|
namespace std {
|
|
class istream {
|
|
public:
|
|
bool is_eof();
|
|
char get_char();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
istream &operator>>(istream &is, char &c) {
|
|
if (is.is_eof())
|
|
return;
|
|
c = is.get_char();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
extern istream cin;
|
|
};
|