29463612d2
To be consistent with RISC-V branding guidelines https://riscv.org/about/risc-v-branding-guidelines/ Think we should be using RISC-V where possible. More patches will follow. Reviewed By: asb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146449
22 lines
667 B
C++
22 lines
667 B
C++
//===-- RISCVTargetInfo.h - RISC-V Target Implementation --------*- C++ -*-===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#ifndef LLVM_LIB_TARGET_RISCV_TARGETINFO_RISCVTARGETINFO_H
|
|
#define LLVM_LIB_TARGET_RISCV_TARGETINFO_RISCVTARGETINFO_H
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
|
|
class Target;
|
|
|
|
Target &getTheRISCV32Target();
|
|
Target &getTheRISCV64Target();
|
|
|
|
} // namespace llvm
|
|
|
|
#endif // LLVM_LIB_TARGET_RISCV_TARGETINFO_RISCVTARGETINFO_H
|