llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/SPIRV/function/trivial-function-definition.ll
Vyacheslav Levytskyy 67d3ef74b3
[SPIR-V] Rework usage of virtual registers' types and classes (#104104)
This PR continues https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101732
changes in virtual register processing aimed to improve correctness of
emitted MIR between passes from the perspective of MachineVerifier.
Namely, the following changes are introduced:
* register classes (lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVRegisterInfo.td) and
instruction patterns (lib/Target/SPIRV/SPIRVInstrInfo.td) are corrected
and simplified (by removing unnecessary sophisticated options) -- e.g.,
this PR gets rid of duplicating 32/64 bits patterns, removes ANYID
register class and simplifies definition of the rest of register
classes,
* hardcoded LLT scalar types in passes before instruction selection are
corrected -- the goal is to have correct bit width before instruction
selection, and use 64 bits registers for pattern matching in the
instruction selection pass; 32-bit registers remain where they are
described in such terms by SPIR-V specification (like, for example,
creation of virtual registers for scope/mem semantics operands),
* rework virtual register type/class assignment for calls/builtins
lowering,
* a series of minor changes to fix validity of emitted code between
passes:
  - ensure that that bitcast changes the type,
  - fix the pattern for instruction selection for OpExtInst,
  - simplify inline asm operands usage,
  - account for arbitrary integer sizes / update legalizer rules;
* add '-verify-machineinstrs' to existed test cases.

See also https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/88129 that this PR
may resolve.

This PR fixes a great number of issues reported by MachineVerifier and,
as a result, reduces a number of failed test cases for the mode with
expensive checks set on from ~200 to ~57.
2024-08-22 09:40:27 +02:00

26 lines
909 B
LLVM

; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs -O0 -mtriple=spirv32-unknown-unknown %s -o - | FileCheck %s
;; Debug info:
; CHECK: OpName %[[#FOO:]] "foo"
;; Types:
; CHECK: %[[#VOID:]] = OpTypeVoid
; CHECK: %[[#FN:]] = OpTypeFunction %[[#VOID]]
;; Functions:
; CHECK: %[[#FOO]] = OpFunction %[[#VOID]] None %[[#FN]]
; CHECK-NOT: OpFunctionParameter
;; NOTE: In 2.4, it isn't explicitly written that a function always has a least
;; one block. In fact, 2.4.11 seems to imply that there are at least two
;; blocks in functions with a body, but that doesn't make much sense.
;; However, in order to distinguish between function declaration and
;; definition, a function needs at least one block, hence why this test
;; expects one OpLabel + OpReturn.
; CHECK: OpLabel
; CHECK: OpReturn
; CHECK-NOT: OpLabel
; CHECK: OpFunctionEnd
define void @foo() {
ret void
}