llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/switch-constant-expr.ll
Nikita Popov ed23609bc2 [PatternMatch] Do not match constant expressions for binops
Currently, m_Mul() style matchers also match constant expressions.
This is a regular source of assertion failures (usually by trying
to do a match and then cast to Instruction or BinaryOperator) and
infinite combine loops. At the same time, I don't think this provides
useful optimization capabilities (all of the tests affected here are
regression tests for crashes / infinite loops).

Long term, all of these constant expressions (apart from possibly
add/sub) are slated for removal per
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179
-- but doing those removals can itself expose new crashes and
infinite loops due to the current PatternMatch behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156401
2023-07-29 11:21:22 +02:00

45 lines
1020 B
LLVM

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
; RUN: opt < %s -passes=instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
@g = global i32 0
; PR30486
define i32 @single_case() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @single_case(
; CHECK-NEXT: switch i32 add (i32 ptrtoint (ptr @g to i32), i32 -1), label [[X:%.*]] [
; CHECK-NEXT: ]
; CHECK: x:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
switch i32 add (i32 ptrtoint (ptr @g to i32), i32 -1), label %x []
x:
ret i32 0
}
define i32 @multiple_cases() {
; CHECK-LABEL: @multiple_cases(
; CHECK-NEXT: switch i32 add (i32 ptrtoint (ptr @g to i32), i32 -1), label [[X:%.*]] [
; CHECK-NEXT: i32 1, label [[ONE:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: i32 2, label [[TWO:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ]
; CHECK: x:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 0
; CHECK: one:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 1
; CHECK: two:
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 2
;
switch i32 add (i32 ptrtoint (ptr @g to i32), i32 -1), label %x [
i32 1, label %one
i32 2, label %two
]
x:
ret i32 0
one:
ret i32 1
two:
ret i32 2
}