llvm-project/clang/test/Parser/explicit-bool.cpp
Aaron Ballman 2cb2cd242c Change the behavior of implicit int diagnostics
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.

This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
2022-05-04 08:35:47 -04:00

63 lines
2.3 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 -verify=cxx17 -Wc++20-compat %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify=cxx20 -Wc++17-compat %s
namespace disambig {
// Cases that are valid in C++17 and before, ill-formed in C++20, and that we
// should not treat as explicit(bool) as an extension.
struct A { // cxx20-note +{{}}
constexpr A() {}
constexpr operator bool() { return true; }
constexpr explicit (A)(int); // #1
// cxx17-warning@#1 {{will be parsed as explicit(bool)}}
// cxx20-error@#1 +{{}} cxx20-note@#1 +{{}}
// cxx20-warning@#1 {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
// This is ill-formed (via a DR change), and shouldn't be recognized as a
// constructor (the function declarator cannot be parenthesized in a
// constructor declaration). But accepting it as an extension seems
// reasonable.
// FIXME: Produce an ExtWarn for this.
constexpr explicit (A(float)); // #1b
// cxx17-warning@#1b {{will be parsed as explicit(bool)}}
// cxx20-error@#1b +{{}}
// cxx20-warning@#1b {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
explicit (operator int)(); // #2
// cxx17-warning@#2 {{will be parsed as explicit(bool)}}
// cxx20-error@#2 +{{}}
// cxx20-warning@#2 {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
explicit (A::operator float)(); // #2b
// cxx17-warning@#2b {{will be parsed as explicit(bool)}}
// cxx17-error@#2b {{extra qualification on member}}
// cxx20-error@#2b +{{}}
// cxx20-warning@#2b {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
};
constexpr bool operator+(A) { return true; }
constexpr bool C = false;
// Cases that should (ideally) be disambiguated as explicit(bool) in earlier
// language modes as an extension.
struct B {
// Looks like a constructor, but not the constructor of B.
explicit (A()) B(); // #3
// cxx17-warning@#3 {{C++20 extension}}
// cxx20-warning@#3 {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
// Looks like a 'constructor' of C. Actually a constructor of B.
explicit (C)(B)(A); // #4
// cxx17-warning@#4 {{C++20 extension}}
// cxx20-warning@#4 {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
explicit (operator+(A())) operator int(); // #5
// cxx17-error@#5 {{a type specifier is required}} cxx17-error@#5 {{expected ';'}}
// cxx17-warning@#5 {{will be parsed as explicit(bool)}}
// cxx20-warning@#5 {{incompatible with C++ standards before C++20}}
};
}