f023da12d1
This commit removes convenience methods from `FloatType` to make it independent of concrete interface implementations. See discussion here: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rethink-on-approach-to-low-precision-fp-types/82361 Note for LLVM integration: Replace `FloatType::getF32(` with `Float32Type::get(` etc.
38 lines
1.6 KiB
C++
38 lines
1.6 KiB
C++
//===- RTBuilder.cpp -- Runtime Interface unit tests ----------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "flang/Optimizer/Builder/Runtime/RTBuilder.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
#include "flang/Optimizer/Support/InitFIR.h"
|
|
#include <complex>
|
|
|
|
// Check that it is possible to make a difference between complex runtime
|
|
// function using C99 complex and C++ std::complex. This is important since
|
|
// they are layout compatible but not link time compatible (returned differently
|
|
// in X86 32 ABI for instance). At high level fir, we need to convey that the
|
|
// signature are different regardless of the target ABI.
|
|
|
|
// Fake runtime header to be introspected.
|
|
c_float_complex_t c99_cacosf(c_float_complex_t);
|
|
|
|
TEST(RTBuilderTest, ComplexRuntimeInterface) {
|
|
mlir::DialectRegistry registry;
|
|
fir::support::registerDialects(registry);
|
|
mlir::MLIRContext ctx(registry);
|
|
fir::support::loadDialects(ctx);
|
|
mlir::Type c99_cacosf_signature{
|
|
fir::runtime::RuntimeTableKey<decltype(c99_cacosf)>::getTypeModel()(
|
|
&ctx)};
|
|
auto c99_cacosf_funcTy = mlir::cast<mlir::FunctionType>(c99_cacosf_signature);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(c99_cacosf_funcTy.getNumInputs(), 1u);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(c99_cacosf_funcTy.getNumResults(), 1u);
|
|
auto cplx_ty = mlir::ComplexType::get(mlir::Float32Type::get(&ctx));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(c99_cacosf_funcTy.getInput(0), cplx_ty);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(c99_cacosf_funcTy.getResult(0), cplx_ty);
|
|
}
|