
After replacing the branch condition, this was calling simplifyCFG to perform the cleanups of the branch. This is far too heavy of a hammer. We do not want all of the extra optimizations in simplifyCFG, and this could also leave behind dead code. Instead, minimally fold the terminator and try to delete the newly dead code. This is pretty much a direct copy of what bugpoint does.
156 lines
4.2 KiB
LLVM
156 lines
4.2 KiB
LLVM
; RUN: llvm-reduce --abort-on-invalid-reduction --delta-passes=simplify-conditionals-true --test FileCheck --test-arg --check-prefixes=CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS,CHECK --test-arg %s --test-arg --input-file %s -o %t
|
|
; RUN: FileCheck --check-prefixes=RESULT-TRUE,RESULT,CHECK %s < %t
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llvm-reduce --abort-on-invalid-reduction --delta-passes=simplify-conditionals-false --test FileCheck --test-arg --check-prefixes=CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS,CHECK --test-arg %s --test-arg --input-file %s -o %t
|
|
; RUN: FileCheck --check-prefixes=RESULT-FALSE,RESULT,CHECK %s < %t
|
|
|
|
; Make sure there is no unreachable code introduced by the reduction
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @func_simplifies_true(
|
|
; CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS: store i32 1,
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE: bb0:
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE: store i32 0, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE-NEXT: store i32 1, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE-NEXT: br label %bb2
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE-NOT: bb1
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb0:
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: store i32 0, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: br i1 %cond0, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb1: ; preds = %bb0
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: store i32 1, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb2: ; preds = %bb0
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: store i32 2, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb3: ; preds = %bb1, %bb2
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: ret void
|
|
define void @func_simplifies_true(i1 %cond0, i1 %cond1) {
|
|
bb0:
|
|
store i32 0, ptr null
|
|
br i1 %cond0, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
|
|
|
bb1:
|
|
store i32 1, ptr null
|
|
br i1 %cond1, label %bb2, label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb2:
|
|
store i32 2, ptr null
|
|
br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb3:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @func_simplifies_false(
|
|
; CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS: store i32 0,
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE: bb0:
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE: store i32 0, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE-NEXT: store i32 1, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE-NEXT: br label %bb2
|
|
; RESULT-TRUE-NOT: bb1
|
|
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb0:
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: store i32 0, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: br label %bb2
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb2: ; preds = %bb0
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: store i32 2, ptr null, align 4
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: bb3: ; preds = %bb2
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: ret void
|
|
define void @func_simplifies_false(i1 %cond0, i1 %cond1) {
|
|
bb0:
|
|
store i32 0, ptr null
|
|
br i1 %cond0, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
|
|
|
bb1:
|
|
store i32 1, ptr null
|
|
br i1 %cond1, label %bb2, label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb2:
|
|
store i32 2, ptr null
|
|
br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb3:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; Make sure we don't break the reduction in the other functions by
|
|
; having something interesting in unrelated unreachable code.
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @func_simplifies_true_with_interesting_unreachable_code(
|
|
; CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS: store i32 0,
|
|
; CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS: store i32 %arg,
|
|
|
|
|
|
; RESULT: bb0:
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: store i32 0
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: br i1 %cond0, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
|
|
|
; RESULT: bb1:
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: store i32 1
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: br i1 %cond1, label %bb2, label %bb3
|
|
|
|
; RESULT: bb2:
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: store i32 2
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
; RESULT: dead_code: ; preds = %dead_code
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: store i32 %arg,
|
|
; RESULT-NEXT: br label %dead_code
|
|
define void @func_simplifies_true_with_interesting_unreachable_code(i1 %cond0, i1 %cond1, i32 %arg) {
|
|
bb0:
|
|
store i32 0, ptr null
|
|
br i1 %cond0, label %bb1, label %bb2
|
|
|
|
bb1:
|
|
store i32 1, ptr null
|
|
br i1 %cond1, label %bb2, label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb2:
|
|
store i32 2, ptr null
|
|
br label %bb3
|
|
|
|
bb3:
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
dead_code:
|
|
store i32 %arg, ptr null
|
|
br label %dead_code
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@block_address_user = constant [1 x ptr] [ptr blockaddress(@will_be_unreachable_blockaddress_use, %will_be_unreachable)]
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: @will_be_unreachable_blockaddress_use(
|
|
; CHECK-INTERESTINGNESS: inttoptr
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: entry:
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: %i2p = inttoptr i64 %int to ptr
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: br label %exit
|
|
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE: exit: ; preds = %entry
|
|
; RESULT-FALSE-NEXT: ret i1 false
|
|
define i1 @will_be_unreachable_blockaddress_use(i1 %cond, i64 %int) {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%i2p = inttoptr i64 %int to ptr
|
|
br i1 %cond, label %will_be_unreachable, label %exit
|
|
|
|
will_be_unreachable:
|
|
%load = load ptr, ptr %i2p, align 8
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
for.body:
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
exit:
|
|
ret i1 false
|
|
}
|