llvm-project/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContextTest.cpp
Wei Yi Tee 00e9d53453 [clang][dataflow] Move logic for creating implication and iff expressions into DataflowAnalysisContext from DataflowEnvironment.
To keep functionality of creating boolean expressions in a consistent location.

Depends On D128357

Reviewed By: gribozavr2, sgatev, xazax.hun

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128519
2022-06-24 23:16:44 +02:00

217 lines
7.5 KiB
C++

//===- unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContextTest.cpp ---===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContext.h"
#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/WatchedLiteralsSolver.h"
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
#include <memory>
namespace {
using namespace clang;
using namespace dataflow;
class DataflowAnalysisContextTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
DataflowAnalysisContextTest()
: Context(std::make_unique<WatchedLiteralsSolver>()) {}
DataflowAnalysisContext Context;
};
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
CreateAtomicBoolValueReturnsDistinctValues) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &Y = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
EXPECT_NE(&X, &Y);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateConjunctionReturnsSameExprGivenSameArgs) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XAndX = Context.getOrCreateConjunction(X, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XAndX, &X);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateConjunctionReturnsSameExprOnSubsequentCalls) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &Y = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XAndY1 = Context.getOrCreateConjunction(X, Y);
auto &XAndY2 = Context.getOrCreateConjunction(X, Y);
EXPECT_EQ(&XAndY1, &XAndY2);
auto &YAndX = Context.getOrCreateConjunction(Y, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XAndY1, &YAndX);
auto &Z = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XAndZ = Context.getOrCreateConjunction(X, Z);
EXPECT_NE(&XAndY1, &XAndZ);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateDisjunctionReturnsSameExprGivenSameArgs) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XOrX = Context.getOrCreateDisjunction(X, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XOrX, &X);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateDisjunctionReturnsSameExprOnSubsequentCalls) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &Y = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XOrY1 = Context.getOrCreateDisjunction(X, Y);
auto &XOrY2 = Context.getOrCreateDisjunction(X, Y);
EXPECT_EQ(&XOrY1, &XOrY2);
auto &YOrX = Context.getOrCreateDisjunction(Y, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XOrY1, &YOrX);
auto &Z = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XOrZ = Context.getOrCreateDisjunction(X, Z);
EXPECT_NE(&XOrY1, &XOrZ);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateNegationReturnsSameExprOnSubsequentCalls) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &NotX1 = Context.getOrCreateNegation(X);
auto &NotX2 = Context.getOrCreateNegation(X);
EXPECT_EQ(&NotX1, &NotX2);
auto &Y = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &NotY = Context.getOrCreateNegation(Y);
EXPECT_NE(&NotX1, &NotY);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateImplicationReturnsTrueGivenSameArgs) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XImpliesX = Context.getOrCreateImplication(X, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XImpliesX, &Context.getBoolLiteralValue(true));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateImplicationReturnsSameExprOnSubsequentCalls) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &Y = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XImpliesY1 = Context.getOrCreateImplication(X, Y);
auto &XImpliesY2 = Context.getOrCreateImplication(X, Y);
EXPECT_EQ(&XImpliesY1, &XImpliesY2);
auto &YImpliesX = Context.getOrCreateImplication(Y, X);
EXPECT_NE(&XImpliesY1, &YImpliesX);
auto &Z = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XImpliesZ = Context.getOrCreateImplication(X, Z);
EXPECT_NE(&XImpliesY1, &XImpliesZ);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, GetOrCreateIffReturnsTrueGivenSameArgs) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XIffX = Context.getOrCreateIff(X, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XIffX, &Context.getBoolLiteralValue(true));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest,
GetOrCreateIffReturnsSameExprOnSubsequentCalls) {
auto &X = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &Y = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XIffY1 = Context.getOrCreateIff(X, Y);
auto &XIffY2 = Context.getOrCreateIff(X, Y);
EXPECT_EQ(&XIffY1, &XIffY2);
auto &YIffX = Context.getOrCreateIff(Y, X);
EXPECT_EQ(&XIffY1, &YIffX);
auto &Z = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &XIffZ = Context.getOrCreateIff(X, Z);
EXPECT_NE(&XIffY1, &XIffZ);
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, EmptyFlowCondition) {
auto &FC = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC, C));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, AddFlowConditionConstraint) {
auto &FC = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC, C);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC, C));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, ForkFlowCondition) {
auto &FC1 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C1 = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C1);
// Forked flow condition inherits the constraints of its parent flow
// condition.
auto &FC2 = Context.forkFlowCondition(FC1);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC2, C1));
// Adding a new constraint to the forked flow condition does not affect its
// parent flow condition.
auto &C2 = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C2);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC2, C2));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC1, C2));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, JoinFlowConditions) {
auto &C1 = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &C2 = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &C3 = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &FC1 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C1);
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C3);
auto &FC2 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C2);
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C3);
auto &FC3 = Context.joinFlowConditions(FC1, FC2);
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C1));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C2));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C3));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, FlowConditionTautologies) {
// Fresh flow condition with empty/no constraints is always true.
auto &FC1 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC1));
// Literal `true` is always true.
auto &FC2 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, Context.getBoolLiteralValue(true));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC2));
// Literal `false` is never true.
auto &FC3 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC3, Context.getBoolLiteralValue(false));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC3));
// We can't prove that an arbitrary bool A is always true...
auto &C1 = Context.createAtomicBoolValue();
auto &FC4 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC4, C1);
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC4));
// ... but we can prove A || !A is true.
auto &FC5 = Context.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(
FC5, Context.getOrCreateDisjunction(C1, Context.getOrCreateNegation(C1)));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC5));
}
} // namespace