llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2b-overloaded-operator.cpp
Corentin Jabot c151225096 [C++2b] Implement multidimentional subscript operator
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.

Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.

Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.

Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;

Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.

We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:

[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error

The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
2022-02-08 12:10:47 -05:00

76 lines
2.0 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -std=c++2b %s
namespace N {
void empty() {
struct S {
int operator[](); // expected-note{{not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided}}
};
S{}[];
S{}[1]; // expected-error {{no viable overloaded operator[] for type 'S'}}
}
void default_var() {
struct S {
constexpr int operator[](int i = 42) { return i; } // expected-note {{not viable: allows at most single argument 'i'}}
};
static_assert(S{}[] == 42);
static_assert(S{}[1] == 1);
static_assert(S{}[1, 2] == 1); // expected-error {{no viable overloaded operator[] for type 'S'}}
}
struct Variadic {
constexpr int operator[](auto... i) { return (42 + ... + i); }
};
void variadic() {
static_assert(Variadic{}[] == 42);
static_assert(Variadic{}[1] == 43);
static_assert(Variadic{}[1, 2] == 45);
}
void multiple() {
struct S {
constexpr int operator[]() { return 0; }
constexpr int operator[](int) { return 1; };
constexpr int operator[](int, int) { return 2; };
};
static_assert(S{}[] == 0);
static_assert(S{}[1] == 1);
static_assert(S{}[1, 1] == 2);
}
void ambiguous() {
struct S {
constexpr int operator[]() { return 0; } // expected-note{{candidate function}}
constexpr int operator[](int = 0) { return 1; }; // expected-note{{candidate function}}
};
static_assert(S{}[] == 0); // expected-error{{call to subscript operator of type 'S' is ambiguous}}
}
} // namespace N
template <typename... T>
struct T1 {
constexpr auto operator[](T... arg) { // expected-note {{candidate function not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 1 was provided}}
return (1 + ... + arg);
}
};
static_assert(T1<>{}[] == 1);
static_assert(T1<int>{}[1] == 2);
static_assert(T1<int, int>{}[1, 1] == 3);
static_assert(T1<int, int>{}[1] == 3); // expected-error {{no viable overloaded operator[] for type 'T1<int, int>'}}
struct T2 {
constexpr auto operator[](auto... arg) {
return (1 + ... + arg);
}
};
static_assert(T2{}[] == 1);
static_assert(T2{}[1] == 2);
static_assert(T2{}[1, 1] == 3);