Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be added at a later commit). Main design goals: * There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and we can't miss one of the debug info type. * In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs * Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax * Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't preferable) Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test cases fixed up for the new style): * Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all debug info separately and this test function should call just "self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info * When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>" and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the debug info will be visible from the end of the test name) * Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an inferior Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028 llvm-svn: 248883
180 lines
7.9 KiB
Python
180 lines
7.9 KiB
Python
"""
|
|
Test lldb data formatter subsystem.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
import os, time
|
|
import unittest2
|
|
import lldb
|
|
from lldbtest import *
|
|
import lldbutil
|
|
|
|
class SkipSummaryDataFormatterTestCase(TestBase):
|
|
|
|
mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
|
|
|
|
@expectedFailureFreeBSD("llvm.org/pr20548") # fails to build on lab.llvm.org buildbot
|
|
@expectedFailureWindows("llvm.org/pr24462") # Data formatters have problems on Windows
|
|
def test_with_run_command(self):
|
|
"""Test data formatter commands."""
|
|
self.build()
|
|
self.data_formatter_commands()
|
|
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
# Call super's setUp().
|
|
TestBase.setUp(self)
|
|
# Find the line number to break at.
|
|
self.line = line_number('main.cpp', '// Set break point at this line.')
|
|
|
|
def data_formatter_commands(self):
|
|
"""Test that that file and class static variables display correctly."""
|
|
self.runCmd("file a.out", CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
|
|
|
|
#import lldbutil
|
|
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line (self, "main.cpp", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True)
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
|
|
|
|
# The stop reason of the thread should be breakpoint.
|
|
self.expect("thread list", STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,
|
|
substrs = ['stopped',
|
|
'stop reason = breakpoint'])
|
|
|
|
# This is the function to remove the custom formats in order to have a
|
|
# clean slate for the next test case.
|
|
def cleanup():
|
|
self.runCmd('type format clear', check=False)
|
|
self.runCmd('type summary clear', check=False)
|
|
|
|
# Execute the cleanup function during test case tear down.
|
|
self.addTearDownHook(cleanup)
|
|
|
|
# Setup the summaries for this scenario
|
|
#self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"${var._M_dataplus._M_p}\" std::string")
|
|
self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"Level 1\" \"DeepData_1\"")
|
|
self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"Level 2\" \"DeepData_2\" -e")
|
|
self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"Level 3\" \"DeepData_3\"")
|
|
self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"Level 4\" \"DeepData_4\"")
|
|
self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"Level 5\" \"DeepData_5\"")
|
|
|
|
# Default case, just print out summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_1) data1 = Level 1',
|
|
'(DeepData_2) data2 = Level 2 {',
|
|
'm_child1 = Level 3',
|
|
'm_child2 = Level 3',
|
|
'm_child3 = Level 3',
|
|
'm_child4 = Level 3',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Skip the default (should be 1) levels of summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable --no-summary-depth',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_1) data1 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = 0x',
|
|
'}',
|
|
'(DeepData_2) data2 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = Level 3',
|
|
'm_child2 = Level 3',
|
|
'm_child3 = Level 3',
|
|
'm_child4 = Level 3',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Now skip 2 levels of summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable --no-summary-depth=2',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_1) data1 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = 0x',
|
|
'}',
|
|
'(DeepData_2) data2 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = 0x',
|
|
'Level 4',
|
|
'm_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_child3 = {',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Check that no "Level 3" comes out
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1 --no-summary-depth=2', matching=False,
|
|
substrs = ['Level 3'])
|
|
|
|
# Now expand a pointer with 2 level of skipped summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1 --no-summary-depth=2',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_2 *) data1.m_child1 = 0x'])
|
|
|
|
# Deref and expand said pointer
|
|
self.expect('frame variable *data1.m_child1 --no-summary-depth=2',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_2) *data1.m_child1 = {',
|
|
'm_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = 0x',
|
|
'Level 4',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Expand an expression, skipping 2 layers of summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1->m_child2 --no-summary-depth=2',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_3) data1.m_child1->m_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = Level 5',
|
|
'm_child2 = Level 5',
|
|
'm_child3 = Level 5',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Expand same expression, skipping only 1 layer of summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1->m_child2 --no-summary-depth=1',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_3) data1.m_child1->m_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_child1 = 0x',
|
|
'Level 4',
|
|
'm_child2 = Level 4',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Bad debugging info on SnowLeopard gcc (Apple Inc. build 5666).
|
|
# Skip the following tests if the condition is met.
|
|
if self.getCompiler().endswith('gcc') and not self.getCompiler().endswith('llvm-gcc'):
|
|
import re
|
|
gcc_version_output = system([[lldbutil.which(self.getCompiler()), "-v"]])[1]
|
|
#print "my output:", gcc_version_output
|
|
for line in gcc_version_output.split(os.linesep):
|
|
m = re.search('\(Apple Inc\. build ([0-9]+)\)', line)
|
|
#print "line:", line
|
|
if m:
|
|
gcc_build = int(m.group(1))
|
|
#print "gcc build:", gcc_build
|
|
if gcc_build >= 5666:
|
|
# rdar://problem/9804600"
|
|
self.skipTest("rdar://problem/9804600 wrong namespace for std::string in debug info")
|
|
|
|
# Expand same expression, skipping 3 layers of summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1->m_child2 --show-types --no-summary-depth=3',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_3) data1.m_child1->m_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_some_text = "Just a test"',
|
|
'm_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_some_text = "Just a test"'])
|
|
|
|
# Expand within a standard string (might depend on the implementation of the C++ stdlib you use)
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1->m_child2.m_child1.m_child2 --no-summary-depth=2',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_5) data1.m_child1->m_child2.m_child1.m_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_some_text = {',
|
|
'_M_dataplus = (_M_p = "Just a test")'])
|
|
|
|
# Repeat the above, but only skip 1 level of summaries
|
|
self.expect('frame variable data1.m_child1->m_child2.m_child1.m_child2 --no-summary-depth=1',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_5) data1.m_child1->m_child2.m_child1.m_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_some_text = "Just a test"',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
# Change summary and expand, first without --no-summary-depth then with --no-summary-depth
|
|
self.runCmd("type summary add --summary-string \"${var.m_some_text}\" DeepData_5")
|
|
|
|
self.expect('fr var data2.m_child4.m_child2.m_child2',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_5) data2.m_child4.m_child2.m_child2 = "Just a test"'])
|
|
|
|
self.expect('fr var data2.m_child4.m_child2.m_child2 --no-summary-depth',
|
|
substrs = ['(DeepData_5) data2.m_child4.m_child2.m_child2 = {',
|
|
'm_some_text = "Just a test"',
|
|
'}'])
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
import atexit
|
|
lldb.SBDebugger.Initialize()
|
|
atexit.register(lambda: lldb.SBDebugger.Terminate())
|
|
unittest2.main()
|