llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp
Richard Smith 7c2bcc9eb0 Fix clang's handling of the copy performed in the second phase of class
copy-initialization. We previously got this wrong in a couple of ways:
 - we only looked for copy / move constructors and constructor templates for
   this copy, and thus would fail to copy in cases where doing so should use
   some other constructor (but see core issue 670),
 - we mishandled the special case for disabling user-defined conversions that
   blocks infinite recursion through repeated application of a copy constructor
   (applying it in slightly too many cases) -- though as far as I can tell,
   this does not ever actually affect the result of overload resolution, and
 - we misapplied the special-case rules for constructors taking a parameter
   whose type is a (reference to) the same class type by incorrectly assuming
   that only happens for copy/move constructors (it also happens for
   constructors instantiated from templates and those inherited from base
   classes).

These changes should only affect strange corner cases (for instance, where the
copy constructor exists but has a non-const-qualified parameter type), so for
the most part it only causes us to produce more 'candidate' notes, but see the
test changes for other cases whose behavior is affected.

llvm-svn: 280776
2016-09-07 02:14:33 +00:00

83 lines
1.9 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
class X {
public:
explicit X(const X&); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
X(int*); // expected-note 3{{candidate constructor}}
explicit X(float*); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}}
};
class Y : public X { };
void f(Y y, int *ip, float *fp) {
X x1 = y; // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'X'}}
X x2 = 0;
X x3 = ip;
X x4 = fp; // expected-error{{no viable conversion}}
X x2a(0); // expected-error{{call to constructor of 'X' is ambiguous}}
X x3a(ip);
X x4a(fp);
}
struct foo {
void bar(); // expected-note{{declared here}}
};
// PR3600
void test(const foo *P) { P->bar(); } // expected-error{{'bar' not viable: 'this' argument has type 'const foo', but function is not marked const}}
namespace PR6757 {
struct Foo {
Foo(); // expected-note{{not viable}}
Foo(Foo&); // expected-note{{candidate constructor not viable}}
};
struct Bar {
operator const Foo&() const;
};
void f(Foo);
void g(Foo foo) {
f(Bar()); // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying parameter of type 'const PR6757::Foo'}}
f(foo);
}
}
namespace DR5 {
// Core issue 5: if a temporary is created in copy-initialization, it is of
// the cv-unqualified version of the destination type.
namespace Ex1 {
struct C { };
C c;
struct A {
A(const A&);
A(const C&);
};
const volatile A a = c; // ok
}
namespace Ex2 {
struct S {
S(S&&);
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L // C++03 or earlier modes
// expected-warning@-2 {{rvalue references are a C++11 extension}}
#endif
S(int);
};
const S a(0);
const S b = 0;
}
}
struct A {};
struct B : A {
B();
B(B&);
B(A);
B(int);
};
B b = 0; // ok, calls B(int) then A(const A&) then B(A).