aefd6c615c
The anonymous and non-anonymous bit-field diagnostics are easily combined into one diagnostic. However, the diagnostic was missing a "the" that is present in the almost-identically worded warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width diagnostic, hence the changes to test cases.
38 lines
1008 B
Objective-C
38 lines
1008 B
Objective-C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fobjc-runtime=macosx-fragile-10.5 -fsyntax-only -verify
|
|
|
|
@interface X
|
|
{
|
|
int a : -1; // expected-error{{bit-field 'a' has negative width}}
|
|
|
|
// rdar://6081627
|
|
int b : 33; // expected-error{{width of bit-field 'b' (33 bits) exceeds the width of its type (32 bits)}}
|
|
|
|
int c : (1 + 0.25); // expected-error{{integer constant expression must have integer type}}
|
|
int d : (int)(1 + 0.25);
|
|
|
|
// rdar://6138816
|
|
int e : 0; // expected-error {{bit-field 'e' has zero width}}
|
|
}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
@interface Base {
|
|
int i;
|
|
}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
@interface WithBitFields: Base {
|
|
void *isa; // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
|
|
unsigned a: 5;
|
|
signed b: 4;
|
|
int c: 5; // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
|
|
}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
@implementation WithBitFields {
|
|
char *isa; // expected-error {{instance variable 'isa' has conflicting type: 'char *' vs 'void *'}}
|
|
unsigned a: 5;
|
|
signed b: 4;
|
|
int c: 3; // expected-error {{instance variable 'c' has conflicting bit-field width}}
|
|
}
|
|
@end
|