31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
63 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
63 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14
|
|
|
|
// <set>
|
|
|
|
// class set
|
|
|
|
// node_type extract(const_iterator);
|
|
|
|
#include <set>
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
#include "min_allocator.h"
|
|
#include "Counter.h"
|
|
|
|
template <class Container>
|
|
void test(Container& c)
|
|
{
|
|
size_t sz = c.size();
|
|
|
|
for (auto first = c.cbegin(); first != c.cend();)
|
|
{
|
|
auto key_value = *first;
|
|
typename Container::node_type t = c.extract(first++);
|
|
--sz;
|
|
assert(t.value() == key_value);
|
|
assert(t.get_allocator() == c.get_allocator());
|
|
assert(sz == c.size());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert(c.size() == 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
{
|
|
using set_type = std::set<int>;
|
|
set_type m = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
|
|
test(m);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
std::set<Counter<int>> m = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
|
|
assert(Counter_base::gConstructed == 6);
|
|
test(m);
|
|
assert(Counter_base::gConstructed == 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
using min_alloc_set = std::set<int, std::less<int>, min_allocator<int>>;
|
|
min_alloc_set m = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
|
|
test(m);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|