Louis Dionne 31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00

53 lines
1.5 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
// <filesystem>
// class file_status
// void type(file_type) noexcept;
// void permissions(perms) noexcept;
#include "filesystem_include.h"
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
#include "test_macros.h"
int main(int, char**) {
using namespace fs;
file_status st;
// type test
{
static_assert(noexcept(st.type(file_type::regular)),
"operation must be noexcept");
static_assert(std::is_same<decltype(st.type(file_type::regular)), void>::value,
"operation must return void");
assert(st.type() != file_type::regular);
st.type(file_type::regular);
assert(st.type() == file_type::regular);
}
// permissions test
{
static_assert(noexcept(st.permissions(perms::owner_read)),
"operation must be noexcept");
static_assert(std::is_same<decltype(st.permissions(perms::owner_read)), void>::value,
"operation must return void");
assert(st.permissions() != perms::owner_read);
st.permissions(perms::owner_read);
assert(st.permissions() == perms::owner_read);
}
return 0;
}