llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/class-layout.cpp
Nikita Popov 32791f19fd [Clang] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC)
These tests all require some adjustments to make sure that struct
types still get generated, mostly done by stripping pointer
indirections.

Some of this may no longer test the situation it was originally
intended for, e.g. the issue from pr18962 just doesn't really
exist anymore with opaque pointers, as we no longer generate
recursive types.
2023-06-08 16:39:57 +02:00

103 lines
2.4 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
// An extra byte should be allocated for an empty class.
namespace Test1 {
// CHECK: %"struct.Test1::A" = type { i8 }
struct A { } a;
}
namespace Test2 {
// No need to add tail padding here.
// CHECK: %"struct.Test2::A" = type { ptr, i32 }
struct A { void *a; int b; } a;
}
namespace Test3 {
// C should have a vtable pointer.
// CHECK: %"struct.Test3::A" = type <{ ptr, i32, [4 x i8] }>
struct A { virtual void f(); int a; } a;
}
namespace Test4 {
// Test from PR5589.
// CHECK: %"struct.Test4::B" = type { %"struct.Test4::A", i16, double }
// CHECK: %"struct.Test4::A" = type { i32, i8, float }
struct A {
int a;
char c;
float b;
};
struct B : public A {
short d;
double e;
} b;
}
namespace Test5 {
struct A {
virtual void f();
char a;
};
// CHECK: %"struct.Test5::B" = type { %"struct.Test5::A.base", i8, i8, [5 x i8] }
struct B : A {
char b : 1;
char c;
} b;
}
// PR10912: don't crash
namespace Test6 {
template <typename T> class A {
// If T is complete, IR-gen will want to translate it recursively
// when translating T*.
T *foo;
};
class B;
// This causes IR-gen to have an incomplete translation of A<B>
// sitting around.
A<B> *a;
class C {};
class B : public C {
// This forces Sema to instantiate A<B>, which triggers a callback
// to IR-gen. Because of the previous, incomplete translation,
// IR-gen actually cares, and it immediately tries to complete
// A<B>'s IR type. That, in turn, causes the translation of B*.
// B isn't complete yet, but it has a definition, and if we try to
// compute a record layout for that definition then we'll really
// regret it later.
A<B> a;
};
// The derived class E and empty base class C are required to
// provoke the original assertion.
class E : public B {};
E *e;
}
// <rdar://problem/11324125>: Make sure this doesn't crash. (It's okay
// if we start rejecting it at some point.)
namespace Test7 {
#pragma pack (1)
class A {};
// CHECK: %"class.Test7::B" = type <{ ptr, %"class.Test7::A" }>
class B {
virtual ~B();
A a;
};
B test(B b) { return b; }
#pragma pack ()
}
// Shouldn't crash.
namespace Test8 {
struct A {};
struct D { int a; };
struct B : virtual D, A { };
struct C : B, A { void f() {} };
C c;
}