
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
43 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
43 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// <tuple>
|
|
|
|
// template <class... Types> class tuple;
|
|
|
|
// template <size_t I, class... Types>
|
|
// typename tuple_element<I, tuple<Types...> >::type const&
|
|
// get(const tuple<Types...>& t);
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
#include <tuple>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
{
|
|
typedef std::tuple<double&, std::string, int> T;
|
|
double d = 1.5;
|
|
const T t(d, "high", 5);
|
|
assert(std::get<0>(t) == 1.5);
|
|
assert(std::get<1>(t) == "high");
|
|
assert(std::get<2>(t) == 5);
|
|
std::get<0>(t) = 2.5;
|
|
assert(std::get<0>(t) == 2.5);
|
|
assert(std::get<1>(t) == "high");
|
|
assert(std::get<2>(t) == 5);
|
|
assert(d == 2.5);
|
|
|
|
std::get<1>(t) = "four";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|