5bdd5d064d
See issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62594 This code does not work on win32: auto lstatic = []() static { return 0; }; int (*f2)(void) = lstatic; Since a calling convention such as CC_X86ThisCall can rightly interfere with the implicit pointer to function conversion if erroneously marked on a static function, the fix entails checking the 'static' specifier on the lambda declarator prior to assigning it a calling convention of an non-static member (which pre-c++23 made sense).
34 lines
794 B
C++
34 lines
794 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace ns1 {
|
|
auto lstatic = []() static { return 3; };
|
|
int (*f2)(void) = lstatic;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace ns1_1 {
|
|
|
|
auto lstatic = []() static consteval //expected-error{{cannot take address of consteval call}} \
|
|
expected-note {{declared here}}
|
|
{ return 3; };
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: the above error should indicate that it was triggered below.
|
|
int (*f2)(void) = lstatic;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace ns2 {
|
|
auto lstatic = []() static { return 3; };
|
|
constexpr int (*f2)(void) = lstatic;
|
|
static_assert(lstatic() == f2());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace ns3 {
|
|
void main() {
|
|
static int x = 10;
|
|
auto L = []() static { return x; };
|
|
}
|
|
}
|