
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
38 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
38 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <string>
|
|
|
|
// Test that <string> provides all of the arithmetic, enum, and pointer
|
|
// hash specializations.
|
|
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
|
|
#include "poisoned_hash_helper.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
test_library_hash_specializations_available();
|
|
{
|
|
test_hash_enabled_for_type<std::string>();
|
|
test_hash_enabled_for_type<std::wstring>();
|
|
#if defined(__cpp_lib_char8_t) && __cpp_lib_char8_t >= 201811L
|
|
test_hash_enabled_for_type<std::u8string>();
|
|
#endif
|
|
#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_UNICODE_CHARS
|
|
test_hash_enabled_for_type<std::u16string>();
|
|
test_hash_enabled_for_type<std::u32string>();
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|