2946cd7010
to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
352 lines
12 KiB
C++
352 lines
12 KiB
C++
//===- unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp --- Multilib tests ---------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Unit tests for Multilib and MultilibSet
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "clang/Driver/Multilib.h"
|
|
#include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang::driver;
|
|
using namespace clang;
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, MultilibValidity) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().isValid()) << "Empty multilib is not valid";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Single indicative flag is not valid";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("-foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Single contraindicative flag is not valid";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Conflicting flags should invalidate the Multilib";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("+foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Multilib should be valid even if it has the same flag twice";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foobar").isValid())
|
|
<< "Seemingly conflicting prefixes shouldn't actually conflict";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity1) {
|
|
Multilib M;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M == M) << "Multilib::operator==() is not reflexive";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity2) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib() == Multilib())
|
|
<< "Separately constructed default multilibs are not equal";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity3) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M1.flag("+foo");
|
|
M2.flag("+foo");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with the same flag should be the same";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence1) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M1.flag("+foo");
|
|
M2.flag("-foo");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence2) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M2.flag("+foo");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Flags make Multilibs different";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence1) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M1.flag("+foo");
|
|
M2.flag("+foo").flag("+foo");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence2) {
|
|
Multilib M1("64");
|
|
Multilib M2;
|
|
M2.gccSuffix("/64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix()";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix() (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence3) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "32");
|
|
Multilib M2;
|
|
M2.osSuffix("/32");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix()";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix() (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence4) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "", "16");
|
|
Multilib M2;
|
|
M2.includeSuffix("/16");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix()";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix() (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence3) {
|
|
Multilib M1("foo");
|
|
Multilib M2("bar");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing gccSuffixes should be different";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Differing gccSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence4) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "foo");
|
|
Multilib M2("", "bar");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing osSuffixes should be different";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Differing osSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence5) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "", "foo");
|
|
Multilib M2("", "", "bar");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing includeSuffixes should be different";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Differing includeSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, Construction1) {
|
|
Multilib M("gcc64", "os64", "inc64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M.gccSuffix() == "/gcc64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M.osSuffix() == "/os64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M.includeSuffix() == "/inc64");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, Construction2) {
|
|
Multilib M1;
|
|
Multilib M2("");
|
|
Multilib M3("", "");
|
|
Multilib M4("", "", "");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (first argument)";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M3)
|
|
<< "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (second argument)";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M4)
|
|
<< "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (third argument)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, Construction3) {
|
|
Multilib M = Multilib().flag("+f1").flag("+f2").flag("-f3");
|
|
for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(),
|
|
E = M.flags().end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(*I)
|
|
.Cases("+f1", "+f2", "-f3", true)
|
|
.Default(false));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool hasFlag(const Multilib &M, StringRef Flag) {
|
|
for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(),
|
|
E = M.flags().end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (*I == Flag)
|
|
return true;
|
|
else if (StringRef(*I).substr(1) == Flag.substr(1))
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction1) {
|
|
// Single maybe
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0);
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64"));
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2);
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (I->gccSuffix() == "/64")
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "+m64");
|
|
else if (I->gccSuffix() == "")
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "-m64");
|
|
else
|
|
FAIL() << "Unrecognized gccSufix: " << I->gccSuffix();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction2) {
|
|
// Double maybe
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("sof").flag("+sof"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL"));
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 4);
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->isValid()) << "Multilb " << *I << " should be valid";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Cases("", "/sof", "/el", "/sof/el", true)
|
|
.Default(false))
|
|
<< "Multilib " << *I << " wasn't expected";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-sof"))
|
|
.Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "+sof"))
|
|
.Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "-sof"))
|
|
.Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+sof"))
|
|
.Default(false))
|
|
<< "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}sof flag";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-EL"))
|
|
.Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "-EL"))
|
|
.Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL"))
|
|
.Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL"))
|
|
.Default(false))
|
|
<< "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}EL flag";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetPushback) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.push_back(Multilib("one"));
|
|
MS.push_back(Multilib("two"));
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2);
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Cases("/one", "/two", true)
|
|
.Default(false));
|
|
}
|
|
MS.clear();
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetRegexFilter) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("one"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("two"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("three"));
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2)
|
|
<< "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
MS.FilterOut("/one/two/three");
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2 - 1)
|
|
<< "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->gccSuffix() != "/one/two/three")
|
|
<< "The filter should have removed " << *I;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetFilterObject) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("orange"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("pear"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("plum"));
|
|
ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ +
|
|
1 /* pear */ +
|
|
1 /* plum */ +
|
|
1 /* pear/plum */ +
|
|
1 /* orange */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/plum */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear/plum */ )
|
|
<< "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
MS.FilterOut([](const Multilib &M) {
|
|
return StringRef(M.gccSuffix()).startswith("/p");
|
|
});
|
|
ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ +
|
|
1 /* orange */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/plum */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear/plum */ )
|
|
<< "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(StringRef(I->gccSuffix()).startswith("/p"))
|
|
<< "The filter should have removed " << *I;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection1) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS1 = MultilibSet()
|
|
.Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64"));
|
|
|
|
Multilib::flags_list FlagM64;
|
|
FlagM64.push_back("+m64");
|
|
Multilib SelectionM64;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagM64, SelectionM64))
|
|
<< "Flag set was {\"+m64\"}, but selection not found";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionM64.gccSuffix() == "/64")
|
|
<< "Selection picked " << SelectionM64 << " which was not expected";
|
|
|
|
Multilib::flags_list FlagNoM64;
|
|
FlagNoM64.push_back("-m64");
|
|
Multilib SelectionNoM64;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagNoM64, SelectionNoM64))
|
|
<< "Flag set was {\"-m64\"}, but selection not found";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionNoM64.gccSuffix() == "")
|
|
<< "Selection picked " << SelectionNoM64 << " which was not expected";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection2) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS2 = MultilibSet()
|
|
.Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL"))
|
|
.Maybe(Multilib("sf").flag("+SF"));
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0; I < 4; ++I) {
|
|
bool IsEL = I & 0x1;
|
|
bool IsSF = I & 0x2;
|
|
Multilib::flags_list Flags;
|
|
if (IsEL)
|
|
Flags.push_back("+EL");
|
|
else
|
|
Flags.push_back("-EL");
|
|
|
|
if (IsSF)
|
|
Flags.push_back("+SF");
|
|
else
|
|
Flags.push_back("-SF");
|
|
|
|
Multilib Selection;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS2.select(Flags, Selection)) << "Selection failed for "
|
|
<< (IsEL ? "+EL" : "-EL") << " "
|
|
<< (IsSF ? "+SF" : "-SF");
|
|
|
|
std::string Suffix;
|
|
if (IsEL)
|
|
Suffix += "/el";
|
|
if (IsSF)
|
|
Suffix += "/sf";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Selection.gccSuffix(), Suffix) << "Selection picked " << Selection
|
|
<< " which was not expected ";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetCombineWith) {
|
|
MultilibSet Coffee;
|
|
Coffee.push_back(Multilib("coffee"));
|
|
MultilibSet Milk;
|
|
Milk.push_back(Multilib("milk"));
|
|
MultilibSet Latte;
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)0);
|
|
Latte.combineWith(Coffee);
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)1);
|
|
Latte.combineWith(Milk);
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)2);
|
|
}
|