jimingham 2f14fb3dde
The C++ dynamic typing tests are failing on Windows, skip for now. (#171922)
This is a follow-on to:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168611

which added a bunch of tests for detecting dynamic types of C++ result
variables. I don't actually know how well dynamic type detection works
on Windows if at all. It would require Windows support, since the
Linux/Darwin version is specific to the Itanium ABI.
2025-12-11 15:14:01 -08:00

174 lines
6.8 KiB
Python

"""
Test the reuse of C++ result variables, particularly making sure
that the dynamic typing is preserved.
"""
import lldb
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
class TestCPPResultVariables(TestBase):
NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE = True
def setUp(self):
TestBase.setUp(self)
self.main_source_file = lldb.SBFileSpec("two-bases.cpp")
def check_dereference(self, result_varname, frame, expr_options):
deref_expr = "*{0}".format(result_varname)
base_children = ValueCheck(
name="Base", value="", children=[ValueCheck(name="base_int", value="100")]
)
base_1_arr_children = [
ValueCheck(name="[0]", value="100"),
ValueCheck(name="[1]", value="101"),
ValueCheck(name="[2]", value="102"),
ValueCheck(name="[3]", value="103"),
ValueCheck(name="[4]", value="104"),
ValueCheck(name="[5]", value="105"),
ValueCheck(name="[6]", value="106"),
ValueCheck(name="[7]", value="107"),
ValueCheck(name="[8]", value="108"),
ValueCheck(name="[9]", value="109"),
]
base_2_arr_children = [
ValueCheck(name="[0]", value="200"),
ValueCheck(name="[1]", value="201"),
ValueCheck(name="[2]", value="202"),
ValueCheck(name="[3]", value="203"),
ValueCheck(name="[4]", value="204"),
ValueCheck(name="[5]", value="205"),
ValueCheck(name="[6]", value="206"),
ValueCheck(name="[7]", value="207"),
ValueCheck(name="[8]", value="208"),
ValueCheck(name="[9]", value="209"),
]
deref_children = [
ValueCheck(
name="Base_1",
value="",
children=[
base_children,
ValueCheck(
name="base_1_arr", value="", children=base_1_arr_children
),
],
),
ValueCheck(
name="Base_2",
value="",
children=[
base_children,
ValueCheck(
name="base_2_arr", value="", children=base_2_arr_children
),
],
),
ValueCheck(name="derived_int", value="1000"),
]
result_var_deref = self.expect_expr(
deref_expr,
result_type="Derived",
result_children=deref_children,
options=expr_options,
)
direct_access_expr = "{0}->derived_int".format(result_varname)
self.expect_expr(direct_access_expr, result_type="int", result_value="1000")
# Also check this by directly accessing the result variable:
result_value = frame.FindValue(result_varname, lldb.eValueTypeConstResult, True)
self.assertTrue(result_value.error.success, "Found my result variable")
value_check = ValueCheck(children=deref_children)
value_check.check_value(
self, result_value, f"{result_varname} children are correct"
)
# Make sure we can also call a function through the derived type:
method_result = self.expect_expr(
f"{result_varname}->method_of_derived()",
result_type="int",
options=expr_options,
)
self.assertEqual(method_result.signed, 500, "Got the right result value")
@skipIfWindows # Dynamic type resolution on Windows doesn't work
def test_virtual_dynamic_results(self):
self.do_test_dynamic_results(True)
@skipIfWindows # Dynamic type resolution on Windows doesn't work
def test_non_virtual_dynamic_results(self):
self.do_test_dynamic_results(False)
def do_test_dynamic_results(self, virtual):
"""Test that when we uses a result variable in a subsequent expression it
uses the dynamic value - if that was requested when the result variable was made.
"""
if virtual:
self.build(dictionary={"CFLAGS_EXTRAS": "-DVIRTUAL=''"})
else:
self.build(dictionary={"CFLAGS_EXTRAS": "-DVIRTUAL='virtual'"})
(target, process, thread, bkpt) = lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
self, "Set a breakpoint here", self.main_source_file
)
frame = thread.GetFrameAtIndex(0)
expr_options = lldb.SBExpressionOptions()
expr_options.SetFetchDynamicValue(lldb.eDynamicDontRunTarget)
base_1_ptr = self.expect_expr(
"base_1_ptr", result_type="Derived *", options=expr_options
)
result_varname = base_1_ptr.GetName()
self.check_dereference(result_varname, frame, expr_options)
# Now do the same thing, but use a persistent result variable:
empty_var = frame.EvaluateExpression(
"void *$base_1_ptr = base_1_ptr", expr_options
)
self.assertIn(
empty_var.error.description,
"unknown error",
"Expressions that don't have results return this error",
)
persist_base_1_ptr = frame.FindValue(
"$base_1_ptr", lldb.eValueTypeConstResult, True
)
self.assertTrue(persist_base_1_ptr.error.success, "Got the persistent variable")
self.check_dereference("$base_1_ptr", frame, expr_options)
# Now check the second of the multiply inherited bases, this one will have an offset_to_top
# that we need to calculate:
base_2_ptr = self.expect_expr(
"base_2_ptr", result_type="Derived *", options=expr_options
)
self.check_dereference(base_2_ptr.GetName(), frame, expr_options)
# Again, do the same thing for a persistent expression variable:
empty_var = frame.EvaluateExpression(
"void *$base_2_ptr = base_2_ptr", expr_options
)
self.check_dereference("$base_2_ptr", frame, expr_options)
# Now try starting from a virtual base class of both our bases:
base_through_1 = self.expect_expr(
"base_through_1", result_type="Derived *", options=expr_options
)
self.check_dereference(base_through_1.GetName(), frame, expr_options)
# Now try starting from a virtual base class of both our bases:
base_through_2 = self.expect_expr(
"base_through_2", result_type="Derived *", options=expr_options
)
self.check_dereference(base_through_2.GetName(), frame, expr_options)
# Now check that we get the right results when we run an
# expression to get the base class object:
base_through_expr = self.expect_expr(
"MakeADerivedReportABase()", result_type="Derived *", options=expr_options
)
self.check_dereference(base_through_expr.GetName(), frame, expr_options)