
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
40 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
40 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <filesystem>
|
|
|
|
// class path
|
|
|
|
// typedef ... value_type;
|
|
// typedef basic_string<value_type> string_type;
|
|
// static constexpr value_type preferred_separator = ...;
|
|
|
|
#include "filesystem_include.h"
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
using namespace fs;
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(path::value_type, char);
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(path::string_type, std::basic_string<path::value_type>);
|
|
{
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(const path::value_type, decltype(path::preferred_separator));
|
|
static_assert(path::preferred_separator == '/', "");
|
|
// Make preferred_separator ODR used by taking its address.
|
|
const char* dummy = &path::preferred_separator;
|
|
((void)dummy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|