31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
40 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
40 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <filesystem>
|
|
|
|
// class path;
|
|
// enum class format;
|
|
|
|
#include "filesystem_include.h"
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
typedef fs::path::format E;
|
|
static_assert(std::is_enum<E>::value, "");
|
|
|
|
// Check that E is a scoped enum by checking for conversions.
|
|
typedef std::underlying_type<E>::type UT;
|
|
static_assert(!std::is_convertible<E, UT>::value, "");
|
|
|
|
LIBCPP_ONLY(static_assert(std::is_same<UT, unsigned char>::value, "")); // Implementation detail
|
|
|
|
static_assert(
|
|
E::auto_format != E::native_format &&
|
|
E::auto_format != E::generic_format &&
|
|
E::native_format != E::generic_format,
|
|
"Expected enumeration values are not unique");
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|