
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
56 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
56 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <functional>
|
|
|
|
// template<CopyConstructible Fn, CopyConstructible... Types>
|
|
// unspecified bind(Fn, Types...);
|
|
// template<Returnable R, CopyConstructible Fn, CopyConstructible... Types>
|
|
// unspecified bind(Fn, Types...);
|
|
|
|
// https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16343
|
|
|
|
#include <cmath>
|
|
#include <functional>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
struct power
|
|
{
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
T
|
|
operator()(T a, T b)
|
|
{
|
|
return static_cast<T>(std::pow(a, b));
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct plus_one
|
|
{
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
T
|
|
operator()(T a)
|
|
{
|
|
return a + 1;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
using std::placeholders::_1;
|
|
|
|
auto g = std::bind(power(), 2, _1);
|
|
assert(g(5) == 32);
|
|
assert(std::bind(plus_one(), g)(5) == 33);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|