Louis Dionne 31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00

50 lines
1.5 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
// <functional>
// bit_not
#include <functional>
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
#include "test_macros.h"
int main(int, char**)
{
typedef std::bit_not<int> F;
const F f = F();
static_assert((std::is_same<F::argument_type, int>::value), "" );
static_assert((std::is_same<F::result_type, int>::value), "" );
assert((f(0xEA95) & 0xFFFF ) == 0x156A);
assert((f(0x58D3) & 0xFFFF ) == 0xA72C);
assert((f(0) & 0xFFFF ) == 0xFFFF);
assert((f(0xFFFF) & 0xFFFF ) == 0);
typedef std::bit_not<> F2;
const F2 f2 = F2();
assert((f2(0xEA95) & 0xFFFF ) == 0x156A);
assert((f2(0xEA95L) & 0xFFFF ) == 0x156A);
assert((f2(0x58D3) & 0xFFFF ) == 0xA72C);
assert((f2(0x58D3L) & 0xFFFF ) == 0xA72C);
assert((f2(0) & 0xFFFF ) == 0xFFFF);
assert((f2(0L) & 0xFFFF ) == 0xFFFF);
assert((f2(0xFFFF) & 0xFFFF ) == 0);
assert((f2(0xFFFFL) & 0xFFFF ) == 0);
constexpr int foo = std::bit_not<int> () (0xEA95) & 0xFFFF;
static_assert ( foo == 0x156A, "" );
constexpr int bar = std::bit_not<> () (0xEA95) & 0xFFFF;
static_assert ( bar == 0x156A, "" );
return 0;
}