31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
50 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
50 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
|
|
|
|
// XFAIL: gcc-7
|
|
|
|
// <functional>
|
|
|
|
// equal_to, not_equal_to, less, et al.
|
|
|
|
// Test that these types can be constructed w/o an initializer in a constexpr
|
|
// context. This is specifically testing gcc.gnu.org/PR83921
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <functional>
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
constexpr bool test_constexpr_context() {
|
|
std::equal_to<T> eq;
|
|
((void)eq);
|
|
std::not_equal_to<T> neq;
|
|
((void)neq);
|
|
std::less<T> l;
|
|
((void)l);
|
|
std::less_equal<T> le;
|
|
((void)le);
|
|
std::greater<T> g;
|
|
((void)g);
|
|
std::greater_equal<T> ge;
|
|
((void)ge);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static_assert(test_constexpr_context<int>(), "");
|
|
static_assert(test_constexpr_context<void>(), "");
|
|
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|