This revision introduces the ability to invoke mem2reg as a rewrite pattern. This also modified the canonical mem2reg pass to use the rewrite pattern approach. Depends on D149825 Reviewed By: gysit Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149958
509 lines
20 KiB
C++
509 lines
20 KiB
C++
//===- Mem2Reg.cpp - Promotes memory slots into values ----------*- C++ -*-===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "mlir/Transforms/Mem2Reg.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Analysis/SliceAnalysis.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/IR/Builders.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/IR/Dominance.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Interfaces/ControlFlowInterfaces.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Interfaces/MemorySlotInterfaces.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/GenericIteratedDominanceFrontier.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace mlir {
|
|
#define GEN_PASS_DEF_MEM2REG
|
|
#include "mlir/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
|
|
} // namespace mlir
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "mem2reg"
|
|
|
|
using namespace mlir;
|
|
|
|
/// mem2reg
|
|
///
|
|
/// This pass turns unnecessary uses of automatically allocated memory slots
|
|
/// into direct Value-based operations. For example, it will simplify storing a
|
|
/// constant in a memory slot to immediately load it to a direct use of that
|
|
/// constant. In other words, given a memory slot addressed by a non-aliased
|
|
/// "pointer" Value, mem2reg removes all the uses of that pointer.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Within a block, this is done by following the chain of stores and loads of
|
|
/// the slot and replacing the results of loads with the values previously
|
|
/// stored. If a load happens before any other store, a poison value is used
|
|
/// instead.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Control flow can create situations where a load could be replaced by
|
|
/// multiple possible stores depending on the control flow path taken. As a
|
|
/// result, this pass must introduce new block arguments in some blocks to
|
|
/// accomodate for the multiple possible definitions. Each predecessor will
|
|
/// populate the block argument with the definition reached at its end. With
|
|
/// this, the value stored can be well defined at block boundaries, allowing
|
|
/// the propagation of replacement through blocks.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This pass computes this transformation in four main steps. The two first
|
|
/// steps are performed during an analysis phase that does not mutate IR.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The two steps of the analysis phase are the following:
|
|
/// - A first step computes the list of operations that transitively use the
|
|
/// memory slot we would like to promote. The purpose of this phase is to
|
|
/// identify which uses must be removed to promote the slot, either by rewiring
|
|
/// the user or deleting it. Naturally, direct uses of the slot must be removed.
|
|
/// Sometimes additional uses must also be removed: this is notably the case
|
|
/// when a direct user of the slot cannot rewire its use and must delete itself,
|
|
/// and thus must make its users no longer use it. If any of those uses cannot
|
|
/// be removed by their users in any way, promotion cannot continue: this is
|
|
/// decided at this step.
|
|
/// - A second step computes the list of blocks where a block argument will be
|
|
/// needed ("merge points") without mutating the IR. These blocks are the blocks
|
|
/// leading to a definition clash between two predecessors. Such blocks happen
|
|
/// to be the Iterated Dominance Frontier (IDF) of the set of blocks containing
|
|
/// a store, as they represent the point where a clear defining dominator stops
|
|
/// existing. Computing this information in advance allows making sure the
|
|
/// terminators that will forward values are capable of doing so (inability to
|
|
/// do so aborts promotion at this step).
|
|
///
|
|
/// At this point, promotion is guaranteed to happen, and the mutation phase can
|
|
/// begin with the following steps:
|
|
/// - A third step computes the reaching definition of the memory slot at each
|
|
/// blocking user. This is the core of the mem2reg algorithm, also known as
|
|
/// load-store forwarding. This analyses loads and stores and propagates which
|
|
/// value must be stored in the slot at each blocking user. This is achieved by
|
|
/// doing a depth-first walk of the dominator tree of the function. This is
|
|
/// sufficient because the reaching definition at the beginning of a block is
|
|
/// either its new block argument if it is a merge block, or the definition
|
|
/// reaching the end of its immediate dominator (parent in the dominator tree).
|
|
/// We can therefore propagate this information down the dominator tree to
|
|
/// proceed with renaming within blocks.
|
|
/// - The final fourth step uses the reaching definition to remove blocking uses
|
|
/// in topological order.
|
|
///
|
|
/// For further reading, chapter three of SSA-based Compiler Design [1]
|
|
/// showcases SSA construction, where mem2reg is an adaptation of the same
|
|
/// process.
|
|
///
|
|
/// [1]: Rastello F. & Bouchez Tichadou F., SSA-based Compiler Design (2022),
|
|
/// Springer.
|
|
|
|
MemorySlotPromoter::MemorySlotPromoter(
|
|
MemorySlot slot, PromotableAllocationOpInterface allocator,
|
|
OpBuilder &builder, DominanceInfo &dominance, MemorySlotPromotionInfo info)
|
|
: slot(slot), allocator(allocator), builder(builder), dominance(dominance),
|
|
info(std::move(info)) {
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
auto isResultOrNewBlockArgument = [&]() {
|
|
if (BlockArgument arg = slot.ptr.dyn_cast<BlockArgument>())
|
|
return arg.getOwner()->getParentOp() == allocator;
|
|
return slot.ptr.getDefiningOp() == allocator;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
assert(isResultOrNewBlockArgument() &&
|
|
"a slot must be a result of the allocator or an argument of the child "
|
|
"regions of the allocator");
|
|
#endif // NDEBUG
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value MemorySlotPromoter::getLazyDefaultValue() {
|
|
if (defaultValue)
|
|
return defaultValue;
|
|
|
|
OpBuilder::InsertionGuard guard(builder);
|
|
builder.setInsertionPointToStart(slot.ptr.getParentBlock());
|
|
return defaultValue = allocator.getDefaultValue(slot, builder);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LogicalResult MemorySlotPromotionAnalyzer::computeBlockingUses(
|
|
DenseMap<Operation *, SmallPtrSet<OpOperand *, 4>> &userToBlockingUses) {
|
|
// The promotion of an operation may require the promotion of further
|
|
// operations (typically, removing operations that use an operation that must
|
|
// delete itself). We thus need to start from the use of the slot pointer and
|
|
// propagate further requests through the forward slice.
|
|
|
|
// First insert that all immediate users of the slot pointer must no longer
|
|
// use it.
|
|
for (OpOperand &use : slot.ptr.getUses()) {
|
|
SmallPtrSet<OpOperand *, 4> &blockingUses =
|
|
userToBlockingUses.getOrInsertDefault(use.getOwner());
|
|
blockingUses.insert(&use);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Then, propagate the requirements for the removal of uses. The
|
|
// topologically-sorted forward slice allows for all blocking uses of an
|
|
// operation to have been computed before it is reached. Operations are
|
|
// traversed in topological order of their uses, starting from the slot
|
|
// pointer.
|
|
SetVector<Operation *> forwardSlice;
|
|
mlir::getForwardSlice(slot.ptr, &forwardSlice);
|
|
for (Operation *user : forwardSlice) {
|
|
// If the next operation has no blocking uses, everything is fine.
|
|
if (!userToBlockingUses.contains(user))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<OpOperand *, 4> &blockingUses = userToBlockingUses[user];
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<OpOperand *> newBlockingUses;
|
|
// If the operation decides it cannot deal with removing the blocking uses,
|
|
// promotion must fail.
|
|
if (auto promotable = dyn_cast<PromotableOpInterface>(user)) {
|
|
if (!promotable.canUsesBeRemoved(blockingUses, newBlockingUses))
|
|
return failure();
|
|
} else if (auto promotable = dyn_cast<PromotableMemOpInterface>(user)) {
|
|
if (!promotable.canUsesBeRemoved(slot, blockingUses, newBlockingUses))
|
|
return failure();
|
|
} else {
|
|
// An operation that has blocking uses must be promoted. If it is not
|
|
// promotable, promotion must fail.
|
|
return failure();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Then, register any new blocking uses for coming operations.
|
|
for (OpOperand *blockingUse : newBlockingUses) {
|
|
assert(llvm::is_contained(user->getResults(), blockingUse->get()));
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<OpOperand *> &newUserBlockingUseSet =
|
|
userToBlockingUses.getOrInsertDefault(blockingUse->getOwner());
|
|
newUserBlockingUseSet.insert(blockingUse);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Because this pass currently only supports analysing the parent region of
|
|
// the slot pointer, if a promotable memory op that needs promotion is outside
|
|
// of this region, promotion must fail because it will be impossible to
|
|
// provide a valid `reachingDef` for it.
|
|
for (auto &[toPromote, _] : userToBlockingUses)
|
|
if (isa<PromotableMemOpInterface>(toPromote) &&
|
|
toPromote->getParentRegion() != slot.ptr.getParentRegion())
|
|
return failure();
|
|
|
|
return success();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Block *, 16> MemorySlotPromotionAnalyzer::computeSlotLiveIn(
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Block *> &definingBlocks) {
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Block *, 16> liveIn;
|
|
|
|
// The worklist contains blocks in which it is known that the slot value is
|
|
// live-in. The further blocks where this value is live-in will be inferred
|
|
// from these.
|
|
SmallVector<Block *> liveInWorkList;
|
|
|
|
// Blocks with a load before any other store to the slot are the starting
|
|
// points of the analysis. The slot value is definitely live-in in those
|
|
// blocks.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Block *, 16> visited;
|
|
for (Operation *user : slot.ptr.getUsers()) {
|
|
if (visited.contains(user->getBlock()))
|
|
continue;
|
|
visited.insert(user->getBlock());
|
|
|
|
for (Operation &op : user->getBlock()->getOperations()) {
|
|
if (auto memOp = dyn_cast<PromotableMemOpInterface>(op)) {
|
|
// If this operation loads the slot, it is loading from it before
|
|
// ever writing to it, so the value is live-in in this block.
|
|
if (memOp.loadsFrom(slot)) {
|
|
liveInWorkList.push_back(user->getBlock());
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we store to the slot, further loads will see that value.
|
|
// Because we did not meet any load before, the value is not live-in.
|
|
if (memOp.getStored(slot))
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The information is then propagated to the predecessors until a def site
|
|
// (store) is found.
|
|
while (!liveInWorkList.empty()) {
|
|
Block *liveInBlock = liveInWorkList.pop_back_val();
|
|
|
|
if (!liveIn.insert(liveInBlock).second)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// If a predecessor is a defining block, either:
|
|
// - It has a load before its first store, in which case it is live-in but
|
|
// has already been processed in the initialisation step.
|
|
// - It has a store before any load, in which case it is not live-in.
|
|
// We can thus at this stage insert to the worklist only predecessors that
|
|
// are not defining blocks.
|
|
for (Block *pred : liveInBlock->getPredecessors())
|
|
if (!definingBlocks.contains(pred))
|
|
liveInWorkList.push_back(pred);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return liveIn;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
using IDFCalculator = llvm::IDFCalculatorBase<Block, false>;
|
|
void MemorySlotPromotionAnalyzer::computeMergePoints(
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Block *> &mergePoints) {
|
|
if (slot.ptr.getParentRegion()->hasOneBlock())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
IDFCalculator idfCalculator(dominance.getDomTree(slot.ptr.getParentRegion()));
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Block *, 16> definingBlocks;
|
|
for (Operation *user : slot.ptr.getUsers())
|
|
if (auto storeOp = dyn_cast<PromotableMemOpInterface>(user))
|
|
if (storeOp.getStored(slot))
|
|
definingBlocks.insert(user->getBlock());
|
|
|
|
idfCalculator.setDefiningBlocks(definingBlocks);
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Block *, 16> liveIn = computeSlotLiveIn(definingBlocks);
|
|
idfCalculator.setLiveInBlocks(liveIn);
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<Block *> mergePointsVec;
|
|
idfCalculator.calculate(mergePointsVec);
|
|
|
|
mergePoints.insert(mergePointsVec.begin(), mergePointsVec.end());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool MemorySlotPromotionAnalyzer::areMergePointsUsable(
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<Block *> &mergePoints) {
|
|
for (Block *mergePoint : mergePoints)
|
|
for (Block *pred : mergePoint->getPredecessors())
|
|
if (!isa<BranchOpInterface>(pred->getTerminator()))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
std::optional<MemorySlotPromotionInfo>
|
|
MemorySlotPromotionAnalyzer::computeInfo() {
|
|
MemorySlotPromotionInfo info;
|
|
|
|
// First, find the set of operations that will need to be changed for the
|
|
// promotion to happen. These operations need to resolve some of their uses,
|
|
// either by rewiring them or simply deleting themselves. If any of them
|
|
// cannot find a way to resolve their blocking uses, we abort the promotion.
|
|
if (failed(computeBlockingUses(info.userToBlockingUses)))
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
// Then, compute blocks in which two or more definitions of the allocated
|
|
// variable may conflict. These blocks will need a new block argument to
|
|
// accomodate this.
|
|
computeMergePoints(info.mergePoints);
|
|
|
|
// The slot can be promoted if the block arguments to be created can
|
|
// actually be populated with values, which may not be possible depending
|
|
// on their predecessors.
|
|
if (!areMergePointsUsable(info.mergePoints))
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
return info;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Value MemorySlotPromoter::computeReachingDefInBlock(Block *block,
|
|
Value reachingDef) {
|
|
for (Operation &op : block->getOperations()) {
|
|
if (auto memOp = dyn_cast<PromotableMemOpInterface>(op)) {
|
|
if (info.userToBlockingUses.contains(memOp))
|
|
reachingDefs.insert({memOp, reachingDef});
|
|
|
|
if (Value stored = memOp.getStored(slot))
|
|
reachingDef = stored;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return reachingDef;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MemorySlotPromoter::computeReachingDefInRegion(Region *region,
|
|
Value reachingDef) {
|
|
if (region->hasOneBlock()) {
|
|
computeReachingDefInBlock(®ion->front(), reachingDef);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct DfsJob {
|
|
llvm::DomTreeNodeBase<Block> *block;
|
|
Value reachingDef;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<DfsJob> dfsStack;
|
|
|
|
auto &domTree = dominance.getDomTree(slot.ptr.getParentRegion());
|
|
|
|
dfsStack.emplace_back<DfsJob>(
|
|
{domTree.getNode(®ion->front()), reachingDef});
|
|
|
|
while (!dfsStack.empty()) {
|
|
DfsJob job = dfsStack.pop_back_val();
|
|
Block *block = job.block->getBlock();
|
|
|
|
if (info.mergePoints.contains(block)) {
|
|
BlockArgument blockArgument =
|
|
block->addArgument(slot.elemType, slot.ptr.getLoc());
|
|
builder.setInsertionPointToStart(block);
|
|
allocator.handleBlockArgument(slot, blockArgument, builder);
|
|
job.reachingDef = blockArgument;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
job.reachingDef = computeReachingDefInBlock(block, job.reachingDef);
|
|
|
|
if (auto terminator = dyn_cast<BranchOpInterface>(block->getTerminator())) {
|
|
for (BlockOperand &blockOperand : terminator->getBlockOperands()) {
|
|
if (info.mergePoints.contains(blockOperand.get())) {
|
|
if (!job.reachingDef)
|
|
job.reachingDef = getLazyDefaultValue();
|
|
terminator.getSuccessorOperands(blockOperand.getOperandNumber())
|
|
.append(job.reachingDef);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (auto *child : job.block->children())
|
|
dfsStack.emplace_back<DfsJob>({child, job.reachingDef});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MemorySlotPromoter::removeBlockingUses() {
|
|
llvm::SetVector<Operation *> usersToRemoveUses;
|
|
for (auto &user : llvm::make_first_range(info.userToBlockingUses))
|
|
usersToRemoveUses.insert(user);
|
|
SetVector<Operation *> sortedUsersToRemoveUses =
|
|
mlir::topologicalSort(usersToRemoveUses);
|
|
|
|
llvm::SmallVector<Operation *> toErase;
|
|
for (Operation *toPromote : llvm::reverse(sortedUsersToRemoveUses)) {
|
|
if (auto toPromoteMemOp = dyn_cast<PromotableMemOpInterface>(toPromote)) {
|
|
Value reachingDef = reachingDefs.lookup(toPromoteMemOp);
|
|
// If no reaching definition is known, this use is outside the reach of
|
|
// the slot. The default value should thus be used.
|
|
if (!reachingDef)
|
|
reachingDef = getLazyDefaultValue();
|
|
|
|
builder.setInsertionPointAfter(toPromote);
|
|
if (toPromoteMemOp.removeBlockingUses(
|
|
slot, info.userToBlockingUses[toPromote], builder, reachingDef) ==
|
|
DeletionKind::Delete)
|
|
toErase.push_back(toPromote);
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto toPromoteBasic = cast<PromotableOpInterface>(toPromote);
|
|
builder.setInsertionPointAfter(toPromote);
|
|
if (toPromoteBasic.removeBlockingUses(info.userToBlockingUses[toPromote],
|
|
builder) == DeletionKind::Delete)
|
|
toErase.push_back(toPromote);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (Operation *toEraseOp : toErase)
|
|
toEraseOp->erase();
|
|
|
|
assert(slot.ptr.use_empty() &&
|
|
"after promotion, the slot pointer should not be used anymore");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MemorySlotPromoter::promoteSlot() {
|
|
computeReachingDefInRegion(slot.ptr.getParentRegion(), {});
|
|
|
|
// Now that reaching definitions are known, remove all users.
|
|
removeBlockingUses();
|
|
|
|
// Update terminators in dead branches to forward default if they are
|
|
// succeeded by a merge points.
|
|
for (Block *mergePoint : info.mergePoints) {
|
|
for (BlockOperand &use : mergePoint->getUses()) {
|
|
auto user = cast<BranchOpInterface>(use.getOwner());
|
|
SuccessorOperands succOperands =
|
|
user.getSuccessorOperands(use.getOperandNumber());
|
|
assert(succOperands.size() == mergePoint->getNumArguments() ||
|
|
succOperands.size() + 1 == mergePoint->getNumArguments());
|
|
if (succOperands.size() + 1 == mergePoint->getNumArguments())
|
|
succOperands.append(getLazyDefaultValue());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "[mem2reg] Promoted memory slot: " << slot.ptr
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
|
|
allocator.handlePromotionComplete(slot, defaultValue);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LogicalResult mlir::tryToPromoteMemorySlots(
|
|
ArrayRef<PromotableAllocationOpInterface> allocators, OpBuilder &builder,
|
|
DominanceInfo &dominance) {
|
|
// Actual promotion may invalidate the dominance analysis, so slot promotion
|
|
// is prepated in batches.
|
|
SmallVector<MemorySlotPromoter> toPromote;
|
|
for (PromotableAllocationOpInterface allocator : allocators) {
|
|
for (MemorySlot slot : allocator.getPromotableSlots()) {
|
|
if (slot.ptr.use_empty())
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
MemorySlotPromotionAnalyzer analyzer(slot, dominance);
|
|
std::optional<MemorySlotPromotionInfo> info = analyzer.computeInfo();
|
|
if (info)
|
|
toPromote.emplace_back(slot, allocator, builder, dominance,
|
|
std::move(*info));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (MemorySlotPromoter &promoter : toPromote)
|
|
promoter.promoteSlot();
|
|
|
|
return success(!toPromote.empty());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LogicalResult Mem2RegPattern::matchAndRewrite(Operation *op,
|
|
PatternRewriter &rewriter) const {
|
|
hasBoundedRewriteRecursion();
|
|
|
|
if (op->getNumRegions() == 0)
|
|
return failure();
|
|
|
|
DominanceInfo dominance;
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<PromotableAllocationOpInterface> allocators;
|
|
// Build a list of allocators to attempt to promote the slots of.
|
|
for (Region ®ion : op->getRegions())
|
|
for (auto allocator : region.getOps<PromotableAllocationOpInterface>())
|
|
allocators.emplace_back(allocator);
|
|
|
|
// Because pattern rewriters are normally not expressive enough to support a
|
|
// transformation like mem2reg, this uses an escape hatch to mark modified
|
|
// operations manually and operate outside of its context.
|
|
rewriter.startRootUpdate(op);
|
|
|
|
OpBuilder builder(rewriter.getContext());
|
|
|
|
if (failed(tryToPromoteMemorySlots(allocators, builder, dominance))) {
|
|
rewriter.cancelRootUpdate(op);
|
|
return failure();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rewriter.finalizeRootUpdate(op);
|
|
return success();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
struct Mem2Reg : impl::Mem2RegBase<Mem2Reg> {
|
|
void runOnOperation() override {
|
|
Operation *scopeOp = getOperation();
|
|
bool changed = false;
|
|
|
|
RewritePatternSet rewritePatterns(&getContext());
|
|
rewritePatterns.add<Mem2RegPattern>(&getContext());
|
|
FrozenRewritePatternSet frozen(std::move(rewritePatterns));
|
|
(void)applyOpPatternsAndFold({scopeOp}, frozen, GreedyRewriteConfig(),
|
|
&changed);
|
|
|
|
if (!changed)
|
|
markAllAnalysesPreserved();
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|