David Majnemer c0a313b57c SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors ...

The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a
load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered.

This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various
types: we had a size mismatch.

This fixes PR21480.

llvm-svn: 222499

2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00

..

address-spaces.ll

[SROA] Teach SROA how to handle pointers from address spaces other than

2014-02-26 08:25:02 +00:00

alignment.ll

Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.

2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00

basictest.ll

[SROA] Use the correct index integer size in GEPs through non-default

2014-02-26 10:08:16 +00:00

big-endian.ll

Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.

2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00

fca.ll

Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.

2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00

phi-and-select.ll

SROA: Don't insert instructions before a PHI

2014-09-01 21:20:14 +00:00

slice-order-independence.ll

SROA: Only split loads on byte boundaries

2014-06-17 00:19:35 +00:00

slice-width.ll

Add a test case for SROA where the store size is bigger than slice size. The

2014-08-22 23:27:04 +00:00

vector-conversion.ll

SROA: Handle casts involving vectors of pointers and integer scalars.

2013-09-21 20:36:04 +00:00

vector-lifetime-intrinsic.ll

Fix a case in SROA where lifetime intrinsics could inhibit alloca promotion. In

2014-08-07 21:07:35 +00:00

vector-promotion.ll

SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors

2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00

vectors-of-pointers.ll

…