N3322 makes NULL + 0 well-defined in C, matching the C++ semantics. Adjust the pointer-overflow sanitizer to no longer report NULL + 0 as a pointer overflow in any language mode. NULL + nonzero will of course continue to be reported. As N3322 is part of https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/previous.html, and we never performed any optimizations based on NULL + 0 being undefined in the first place, I'm applying this change to all C versions.
44 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
44 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O0 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O1 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O2 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O3 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O0 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O1 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O2 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O3 %s -o %t && %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O0 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O1 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O2 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
// RUN: %clang -x c -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O3 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O0 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O1 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O2 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx -x c++ -fsanitize=pointer-overflow -O3 %s -o %t && %run %t I_AM_UB 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="runtime error:" --check-prefix=CHECK-UB
|
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
// Just so deduplication doesn't do anything.
|
|
static char *getelementpointer_inbounds_v0(char *base, unsigned long offset) {
|
|
// Potentially UB.
|
|
return base + offset;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
|
|
char *base;
|
|
unsigned long offset;
|
|
|
|
printf("Dummy\n");
|
|
// CHECK: Dummy
|
|
|
|
base = (char *)0;
|
|
offset = argc - 1;
|
|
(void)getelementpointer_inbounds_v0(base, offset);
|
|
// CHECK-UB: {{.*}}.cpp:[[@LINE-13]]:15: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 1 to null pointer
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|