llvm-project/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-constructor.cpp
Richard Smith 420fa12dfd Improve the "braces around scalar init" warning to determine whether to warn
based on whether "redundant" braces are ever reasonable as part of the
initialization of the entity, rather than whether the initialization is
"top-level". In passing, add a warning flag for it.

llvm-svn: 228896
2015-02-12 01:50:05 +00:00

410 lines
10 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++0x -fsyntax-only -fexceptions -verify %s
struct one { char c[1]; };
struct two { char c[2]; };
namespace std {
typedef decltype(sizeof(int)) size_t;
// libc++'s implementation
template <class _E>
class initializer_list
{
const _E* __begin_;
size_t __size_;
initializer_list(const _E* __b, size_t __s)
: __begin_(__b),
__size_(__s)
{}
public:
typedef _E value_type;
typedef const _E& reference;
typedef const _E& const_reference;
typedef size_t size_type;
typedef const _E* iterator;
typedef const _E* const_iterator;
initializer_list() : __begin_(nullptr), __size_(0) {}
size_t size() const {return __size_;}
const _E* begin() const {return __begin_;}
const _E* end() const {return __begin_ + __size_;}
};
}
namespace objects {
struct X1 { X1(int); };
struct X2 { explicit X2(int); }; // expected-note {{constructor declared here}}
template <int N>
struct A {
A() { static_assert(N == 0, ""); }
A(int, double) { static_assert(N == 1, ""); }
};
template <int N>
struct F {
F() { static_assert(N == 0, ""); }
F(int, double) { static_assert(N == 1, ""); }
F(std::initializer_list<int>) { static_assert(N == 3, ""); }
};
template <int N>
struct D {
D(std::initializer_list<int>) { static_assert(N == 0, ""); } // expected-note 1 {{candidate}}
D(std::initializer_list<double>) { static_assert(N == 1, ""); } // expected-note 1 {{candidate}}
};
template <int N>
struct E {
E(int, int) { static_assert(N == 0, ""); }
E(X1, int) { static_assert(N == 1, ""); }
};
void overload_resolution() {
{ A<0> a{}; }
{ A<0> a = {}; }
{ A<1> a{1, 1.0}; }
{ A<1> a = {1, 1.0}; }
{ F<0> f{}; }
{ F<0> f = {}; }
// Narrowing conversions don't affect viability. The next two choose
// the initializer_list constructor.
{ F<3> f{1, 1.0}; } // expected-error {{type 'double' cannot be narrowed to 'int' in initializer list}} expected-note {{silence}}
{ F<3> f = {1, 1.0}; } // expected-error {{type 'double' cannot be narrowed to 'int' in initializer list}} expected-note {{silence}}
{ F<3> f{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; }
{ F<3> f = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; }
{ F<3> f{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}; }
{ F<3> f{1, 2}; }
{ D<0> d{1, 2, 3}; }
{ D<1> d{1.0, 2.0, 3.0}; }
{ D<-1> d{1, 2.0}; } // expected-error {{ambiguous}}
{ E<0> e{1, 2}; }
}
void explicit_implicit() {
{ X1 x{0}; }
{ X1 x = {0}; }
{ X2 x{0}; }
{ X2 x = {0}; } // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
}
struct C {
C();
C(int, double);
C(int, int);
int operator[](C);
};
C function_call() {
void takes_C(C);
takes_C({1, 1.0});
C c;
c[{1, 1.0}];
return {1, 1.0};
}
void inline_init() {
(void) C{1, 1.0};
(void) new C{1, 1.0};
(void) A<1>{1, 1.0};
(void) new A<1>{1, 1.0};
}
struct B { // expected-note 2 {{candidate constructor}}
B(C, int, C); // expected-note {{candidate constructor not viable: cannot convert initializer list argument to 'objects::C'}}
};
void nested_init() {
B b1{{1, 1.0}, 2, {3, 4}};
B b2{{1, 1.0, 4}, 2, {3, 4}}; // expected-error {{no matching constructor for initialization of 'objects::B'}}
}
void overloaded_call() {
one ov1(B); // expected-note {{not viable: cannot convert initializer list}}
two ov1(C); // expected-note {{not viable: cannot convert initializer list}}
static_assert(sizeof(ov1({})) == sizeof(two), "bad overload");
static_assert(sizeof(ov1({1, 2})) == sizeof(two), "bad overload");
static_assert(sizeof(ov1({{1, 1.0}, 2, {3, 4}})) == sizeof(one), "bad overload");
ov1({1}); // expected-error {{no matching function}}
one ov2(int);
two ov2(F<3>);
// expected-warning@+1 {{braces around scalar initializer}}
static_assert(sizeof(ov2({1})) == sizeof(one), "bad overload"); // list -> int ranks as identity
static_assert(sizeof(ov2({1, 2, 3})) == sizeof(two), "bad overload"); // list -> F only viable
}
struct G { // expected-note 6 {{not viable}}
// This is not an initializer-list constructor.
template<typename ...T>
G(std::initializer_list<int>, T ...); // expected-note 3 {{not viable}}
};
struct H { // expected-note 6 {{not viable}}
explicit H(int, int); // expected-note 3 {{not viable}} expected-note {{declared here}}
H(int, void*); // expected-note 3 {{not viable}}
};
void edge_cases() {
// invalid (the first phase only considers init-list ctors)
// (for the second phase, no constructor is viable)
G g1{1, 2, 3}; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
(void) new G{1, 2, 3}; // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
(void) G{1, 2, 3} // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
// valid (T deduced to <>).
G g2({1, 2, 3});
(void) new G({1, 2, 3});
(void) G({1, 2, 3});
// invalid
H h1({1, 2}); // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
(void) new H({1, 2}); // expected-error {{no matching constructor}}
// FIXME: Bad diagnostic, mentions void type instead of init list.
(void) H({1, 2}); // expected-error {{no matching conversion}}
// valid (by copy constructor).
H h2({1, nullptr});
(void) new H({1, nullptr});
(void) H({1, nullptr});
// valid
H h3{1, 2};
(void) new H{1, 2};
(void) H{1, 2};
}
struct memberinit {
H h1{1, nullptr};
H h2 = {1, nullptr};
H h3{1, 1};
H h4 = {1, 1}; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
};
}
namespace PR12092 {
struct S {
S(const char*);
};
struct V {
template<typename T> V(T, T);
void f(std::initializer_list<S>);
void f(const V &);
};
void g() {
extern V s;
s.f({"foo", "bar"});
}
}
namespace PR12117 {
struct A { A(int); };
struct B { B(A); } b{{0}}; //FIXME: non-conformant. Temporary fix until standard resolution.
// expected- error {{call to constructor of 'struct B' is ambiguous}} \
// expected- note 2{{candidate is the implicit}} \
// expected- note {{candidate constructor}}
struct C { C(int); } c{0};
}
namespace PR12167 {
template<int N> struct string {};
struct X {
X(const char v);
template<typename T> bool operator()(T) const;
};
template<int N, class Comparator> bool g(const string<N>& s, Comparator cmp) {
return cmp(s);
}
template<int N> bool f(const string<N> &s) {
return g(s, X{'x'});
}
bool s = f(string<1>());
}
namespace PR12257_PR12241 {
struct command_pair
{
command_pair(int, int);
};
struct command_map
{
command_map(std::initializer_list<command_pair>);
};
struct generator_pair
{
generator_pair(const command_map);
};
// 5 levels: init list, gen_pair, command_map, init list, command_pair
const std::initializer_list<generator_pair> x = {{{{{3, 4}}}}};
// 4 levels: init list, gen_pair, command_map via init list, command_pair
const std::initializer_list<generator_pair> y = {{{{1, 2}}}};
}
namespace PR12120 {
struct A { explicit A(int); A(float); }; // expected-note {{declared here}}
A a = { 0 }; // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
struct B { explicit B(short); B(long); }; // expected-note 2 {{candidate}}
B b = { 0 }; // expected-error {{ambiguous}}
}
namespace PR12498 {
class ArrayRef; // expected-note{{forward declaration}}
struct C {
void foo(const ArrayRef&); // expected-note{{passing argument to parameter here}}
};
static void bar(C* c)
{
c->foo({ nullptr, 1 }); // expected-error{{initialization of incomplete type 'const PR12498::ArrayRef'}}
}
}
namespace explicit_default {
struct A {
explicit A(); // expected-note{{here}}
};
A a {}; // ok
// This is copy-list-initialization, and we choose an explicit constructor
// (even though we do so via value-initialization), so the initialization is
// ill-formed.
A b = {}; // expected-error{{chosen constructor is explicit}}
}
namespace init_list_default {
struct A {
A(std::initializer_list<int>);
};
A a {}; // calls initializer list constructor
struct B {
B();
B(std::initializer_list<int>) = delete;
};
B b {}; // calls default constructor
}
// PR13470, <rdar://problem/11974632>
namespace PR13470 {
struct W {
explicit W(int); // expected-note {{here}}
};
struct X {
X(const X&) = delete; // expected-note 3 {{here}}
X(int);
};
template<typename T, typename Fn> void call(Fn f) {
f({1}); // expected-error {{constructor is explicit}}
f(T{1}); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
}
void ref_w(const W &); // expected-note 2 {{not viable}}
void call_ref_w() {
ref_w({1}); // expected-error {{no matching function}}
ref_w(W{1});
call<W>(ref_w); // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
}
void ref_x(const X &);
void call_ref_x() {
ref_x({1});
ref_x(X{1});
call<X>(ref_x); // ok
}
void val_x(X); // expected-note 2 {{parameter}}
void call_val_x() {
val_x({1});
val_x(X{1}); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
call<X>(val_x); // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
}
template<typename T>
struct Y {
X x{1};
void f() { X x{1}; }
void h() {
ref_w({1}); // expected-error {{no matching function}}
ref_w(W{1});
ref_x({1});
ref_x(X{1});
val_x({1});
val_x(X{1}); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
}
Y() {}
Y(int) : x{1} {}
};
Y<int> yi;
Y<int> yi2(0);
void g() {
yi.f();
yi.h(); // ok, all diagnostics produced in template definition
}
}
namespace PR19729 {
struct A {
A(int);
A(const A&) = delete;
};
struct B {
void *operator new(std::size_t, A);
};
B *p = new ({123}) B;
}
namespace PR11410 {
struct A {
A() = delete; // expected-note 2{{deleted here}}
A(int);
};
A a[3] = {
{1}, {2}
}; // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}} \
expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 2 with omitted initializer}}
struct B {
A a; // expected-note {{in implicit initialization of field 'a'}}
} b = {
}; // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
struct C {
C(int = 0); // expected-note 2{{candidate}}
C(float = 0); // expected-note 2{{candidate}}
};
C c[3] = {
0, 1
}; // expected-error {{ambiguous}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 2}}
C c2[3] = {
[0] = 1, [2] = 3
}; // expected-error {{ambiguous}} expected-note {{in implicit initialization of array element 1}}
}