85f9055955
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed with the written tag). Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too sorry for my fingers. llvm-svn: 98149
32 lines
1021 B
C++
32 lines
1021 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
struct A {
|
|
A() : value(), cvalue() { } // expected-error {{reference to type 'int' requires an initializer}}
|
|
int &value;
|
|
const int cvalue;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct B {
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct X {
|
|
X() { } // expected-error {{constructor for 'X' must explicitly initialize the reference member 'value'}} \
|
|
// expected-error {{constructor for 'X' must explicitly initialize the const member 'cvalue'}} \
|
|
// expected-error {{constructor for 'X' must explicitly initialize the reference member 'b'}} \
|
|
// expected-error {{constructor for 'X' must explicitly initialize the const member 'cb'}}
|
|
int &value; // expected-note{{declared at}}
|
|
const int cvalue; // expected-note{{declared at}}
|
|
B& b; // expected-note{{declared at}}
|
|
const B cb; // expected-note{{declared here}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
// PR5924
|
|
struct bar {};
|
|
bar xxx();
|
|
|
|
struct foo {
|
|
foo_t a; // expected-error {{unknown type name 'foo_t'}}
|
|
foo() : a(xxx()) {} // no error here.
|
|
};
|