8fbe78f6fc
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446
39 lines
1015 B
C++
39 lines
1015 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++0x
|
|
struct T1 {
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(__has_trivial_constructor(T1), "T1 has trivial constructor!");
|
|
|
|
struct T2 {
|
|
T2();
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(!__has_trivial_constructor(T2), "T2 has a user-declared constructor!");
|
|
|
|
struct T3 {
|
|
virtual void f();
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(!__has_trivial_constructor(T3), "T3 has a virtual function!");
|
|
|
|
struct T4 : virtual T3 {
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(!__has_trivial_constructor(T4), "T4 has a virtual base class!");
|
|
|
|
struct T5 : T1 {
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(__has_trivial_constructor(T5), "All the direct base classes of T5 have trivial constructors!");
|
|
|
|
struct T6 {
|
|
T5 t5;
|
|
T1 t1[2][2];
|
|
static T2 t2;
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(__has_trivial_constructor(T6), "All nonstatic data members of T6 have trivial constructors!");
|
|
|
|
struct T7 {
|
|
T4 t4;
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(!__has_trivial_constructor(T7), "t4 does not have a trivial constructor!");
|
|
|
|
struct T8 : T2 {
|
|
};
|
|
static_assert(!__has_trivial_constructor(T8), "The base class T2 does not have a trivial constructor!");
|