Erich Keane 1da3119025 Revert "Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion"
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.

This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
2022-07-21 06:40:14 -07:00

89 lines
3.1 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14
// <variant>
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator==(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator!=(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator<(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator>(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator<=(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
//
// template <class ...Types>
// constexpr bool
// operator>=(variant<Types...> const&, variant<Types...> const&) noexcept;
#include <cassert>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <variant>
#include "test_macros.h"
struct MyBoolExplicit {
bool value;
constexpr explicit MyBoolExplicit(bool v) : value(v) {}
constexpr explicit operator bool() const noexcept { return value; }
};
struct ComparesToMyBoolExplicit {
int value = 0;
};
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator==(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value == RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator!=(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value != RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator<(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value < RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator<=(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value <= RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator>(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value > RHS.value);
}
inline constexpr MyBoolExplicit operator>=(const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& LHS, const ComparesToMyBoolExplicit& RHS) noexcept {
return MyBoolExplicit(LHS.value >= RHS.value);
}
int main(int, char**) {
using V = std::variant<int, ComparesToMyBoolExplicit>;
V v1(42);
V v2(101);
// expected-error-re@variant:* 6 {{static_assert failed{{.*}}the relational operator does not return a type which is implicitly convertible to bool}}
// expected-error@variant:* 6 {{no viable conversion}}
(void)(v1 == v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 != v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 < v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 <= v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 > v2); // expected-note {{here}}
(void)(v1 >= v2); // expected-note {{here}}
return 0;
}