Vasileios Porpodas 27bd8f9492 Recommit "[SLP] Fix lookahead operand reordering for splat loads." attempt 2, fixed assertion crash.
Original review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121354

This reverts commit f7d7d2a08d16356c57f6d2d36bc2fc0589a55df9.
2022-03-22 16:41:55 -07:00
..
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-02-06 22:18:35 -08:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00
2022-03-01 18:01:54 +01:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//