Currently, FunctionAttrs treats landingpads as non-throwing, and
will infer nounwind for functions with landingpads (assuming they
can't unwind in some other way, e.g. via resum). There are two
problems with this:
* Non-cleanup landingpads with catch/filter clauses do not
necessarily catch all exceptions. Unless there are catch ptr null
or filter [0 x ptr] zeroinitializer clauses, we should assume
that we may unwind past this landingpad. This seems like an
outright bug.
* Cleanup landingpads are skipped during phase one unwinding, so
we effectively need to support unwinding past them. Marking these
nounwind is technically correct, but not compatible with how
unwinding works in reality.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61945.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147694
9fe78db4cd