This simplifies a lot of handling of BoolAttr/IntegerAttr. For example, a lot of places currently have to handle both IntegerAttr and BoolAttr. In other places, a decision is made to pick one which can lead to surprising results for users. For example, DenseElementsAttr currently uses BoolAttr for i1 even if the user initialized it with an Array of i1 IntegerAttrs. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81047
181 lines
4.5 KiB
MLIR
181 lines
4.5 KiB
MLIR
// RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -pass-pipeline="func(sccp)" -split-input-file | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
/// Check simple forward constant propagation without any control flow.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @no_control_flow
|
|
func @no_control_flow(%arg0: i32) -> i32 {
|
|
// CHECK: %[[CST:.*]] = constant 1 : i32
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[CST]] : i32
|
|
|
|
%cond = constant true
|
|
%cst_1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
%select = select %cond, %cst_1, %arg0 : i32
|
|
return %select : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check that a constant is properly propagated when only one edge of a branch
|
|
/// is taken.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @simple_control_flow
|
|
func @simple_control_flow(%arg0 : i32) -> i32 {
|
|
// CHECK: %[[CST:.*]] = constant 1 : i32
|
|
|
|
%cond = constant true
|
|
%1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
cond_br %cond, ^bb1, ^bb2(%arg0 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb1:
|
|
br ^bb2(%1 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb2(%arg : i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2(%{{.*}}: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[CST]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %arg : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check that the arguments go to overdefined if the branch cannot detect when
|
|
/// a specific successor is taken.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @simple_control_flow_overdefined
|
|
func @simple_control_flow_overdefined(%arg0 : i32, %arg1 : i1) -> i32 {
|
|
%1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
cond_br %arg1, ^bb1, ^bb2(%arg0 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb1:
|
|
br ^bb2(%1 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb2(%arg : i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2(%[[ARG:.*]]: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[ARG]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %arg : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check that the arguments go to overdefined if there are conflicting
|
|
/// constants.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @simple_control_flow_constant_overdefined
|
|
func @simple_control_flow_constant_overdefined(%arg0 : i32, %arg1 : i1) -> i32 {
|
|
%1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
%2 = constant 2 : i32
|
|
cond_br %arg1, ^bb1, ^bb2(%arg0 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb1:
|
|
br ^bb2(%2 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb2(%arg : i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2(%[[ARG:.*]]: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[ARG]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %arg : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check that the arguments go to overdefined if the branch is unknown.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @unknown_terminator
|
|
func @unknown_terminator(%arg0 : i32, %arg1 : i1) -> i32 {
|
|
%1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
"foo.cond_br"() [^bb1, ^bb2] : () -> ()
|
|
|
|
^bb1:
|
|
br ^bb2(%1 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb2(%arg : i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2(%[[ARG:.*]]: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[ARG]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %arg : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check that arguments are properly merged across loop-like control flow.
|
|
|
|
func @ext_cond_fn() -> i1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @simple_loop
|
|
func @simple_loop(%arg0 : i32, %cond1 : i1) -> i32 {
|
|
// CHECK: %[[CST:.*]] = constant 1 : i32
|
|
|
|
%cst_1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
cond_br %cond1, ^bb1(%cst_1 : i32), ^bb2(%cst_1 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb1(%iv: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb1(%{{.*}}: i32):
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[COND:.*]] = call @ext_cond_fn()
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: cond_br %[[COND]], ^bb1(%[[CST]] : i32), ^bb2(%[[CST]] : i32)
|
|
|
|
%cst_0 = constant 0 : i32
|
|
%res = addi %iv, %cst_0 : i32
|
|
%cond2 = call @ext_cond_fn() : () -> i1
|
|
cond_br %cond2, ^bb1(%res : i32), ^bb2(%res : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb2(%arg : i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2(%{{.*}}: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[CST]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %arg : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Test that we can properly propagate within inner control, and in situations
|
|
/// where the executable edges within the CFG are sensitive to the current state
|
|
/// of the analysis.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @simple_loop_inner_control_flow
|
|
func @simple_loop_inner_control_flow(%arg0 : i32) -> i32 {
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: %[[CST:.*]] = constant 1 : i32
|
|
// CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUE:.*]] = constant true
|
|
|
|
%cst_1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
br ^bb1(%cst_1 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb1(%iv: i32):
|
|
%cond2 = call @ext_cond_fn() : () -> i1
|
|
cond_br %cond2, ^bb5(%iv : i32), ^bb2
|
|
|
|
^bb2:
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2:
|
|
// CHECK: cond_br %[[TRUE]], ^bb3, ^bb4
|
|
|
|
%cst_20 = constant 20 : i32
|
|
%cond = cmpi "ult", %iv, %cst_20 : i32
|
|
cond_br %cond, ^bb3, ^bb4
|
|
|
|
^bb3:
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb3:
|
|
// CHECK: br ^bb1(%[[CST]] : i32)
|
|
|
|
%cst_1_2 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
br ^bb1(%cst_1_2 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb4:
|
|
%iv_inc = addi %iv, %cst_1 : i32
|
|
br ^bb1(%iv_inc : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb5(%result: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb5(%{{.*}}: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[CST]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %result : i32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check that arguments go to overdefined when loop backedges produce a
|
|
/// conflicting value.
|
|
|
|
func @ext_cond_and_value_fn() -> (i1, i32)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: func @simple_loop_overdefined
|
|
func @simple_loop_overdefined(%arg0 : i32, %cond1 : i1) -> i32 {
|
|
%cst_1 = constant 1 : i32
|
|
cond_br %cond1, ^bb1(%cst_1 : i32), ^bb2(%cst_1 : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb1(%iv: i32):
|
|
%cond2, %res = call @ext_cond_and_value_fn() : () -> (i1, i32)
|
|
cond_br %cond2, ^bb1(%res : i32), ^bb2(%res : i32)
|
|
|
|
^bb2(%arg : i32):
|
|
// CHECK: ^bb2(%[[ARG:.*]]: i32):
|
|
// CHECK: return %[[ARG]] : i32
|
|
|
|
return %arg : i32
|
|
}
|