llvm-project/clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContextTest.cpp
Sam McCall 5e4ad816bf [dataflow] Replace most BoolValue subclasses with references to Formula (and AtomicBoolValue => Atom and BoolValue => Formula where appropriate)
This properly frees the Value hierarchy from managing boolean formulas.

We still distinguish AtomicBoolValue; this type is used in client code.
However we expect to convert such uses to BoolValue (where the
distinction is not needed) or Atom (where atomic identity is intended),
and then fold AtomicBoolValue into FormulaBoolValue.

We also distinguish TopBoolValue; this has distinct rules for
widen/join/equivalence, and top-ness is not represented in Formula.
It'd be nice to find a cleaner representation (e.g. the absence of a
formula), but no immediate plans.

For now, BoolValues with the same Formula are deduplicated. This doesn't
seem desirable, as Values are mutable by their creators (properties).
We can probably drop this for FormulaBoolValue immediately (not in this
patch, to isolate changes). For AtomicBoolValue we first need to update
clients to stop using value pointers for atom identity.

The data structures around flow conditions are updated:
- flow condition tokens are Atom, rather than AtomicBoolValue*
- conditions are Formula, rather than BoolValue
Most APIs were changed directly, some with many clients had a
new version added and the existing one deprecated.

The factories for BoolValues in Environment keep their existing
signatures for now (e.g. makeOr(BoolValue, BoolValue) => BoolValue)
and are not deprecated. These have very many clients and finding the
most ergonomic API & migration path still needs some thought.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153469
2023-07-05 13:54:32 +02:00

162 lines
5.6 KiB
C++

//===- unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContextTest.cpp ---===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysisContext.h"
#include "clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/WatchedLiteralsSolver.h"
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
#include <memory>
namespace {
using namespace clang;
using namespace dataflow;
class DataflowAnalysisContextTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
DataflowAnalysisContextTest()
: Context(std::make_unique<WatchedLiteralsSolver>()), A(Context.arena()) {
}
DataflowAnalysisContext Context;
Arena &A;
};
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, DistinctTopsNotEquivalent) {
auto &X = A.makeTopValue();
auto &Y = A.makeTopValue();
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentFormulas(X.formula(), Y.formula()));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, EmptyFlowCondition) {
Atom FC = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC, C));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, AddFlowConditionConstraint) {
Atom FC = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC, C);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC, C));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, ForkFlowCondition) {
Atom FC1 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
auto &C1 = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C1);
// Forked flow condition inherits the constraints of its parent flow
// condition.
Atom FC2 = Context.forkFlowCondition(FC1);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC2, C1));
// Adding a new constraint to the forked flow condition does not affect its
// parent flow condition.
auto &C2 = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C2);
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC2, C2));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC1, C2));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, JoinFlowConditions) {
auto &C1 = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
auto &C2 = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
auto &C3 = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
Atom FC1 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C1);
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC1, C3);
Atom FC2 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C2);
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, C3);
Atom FC3 = Context.joinFlowConditions(FC1, FC2);
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C1));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C2));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionImplies(FC3, C3));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, FlowConditionTautologies) {
// Fresh flow condition with empty/no constraints is always true.
Atom FC1 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC1));
// Literal `true` is always true.
Atom FC2 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC2, A.makeLiteral(true));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC2));
// Literal `false` is never true.
Atom FC3 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC3, A.makeLiteral(false));
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC3));
// We can't prove that an arbitrary bool A is always true...
auto &C1 = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
Atom FC4 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC4, C1);
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC4));
// ... but we can prove A || !A is true.
Atom FC5 = A.makeFlowConditionToken();
Context.addFlowConditionConstraint(FC5, A.makeOr(C1, A.makeNot(C1)));
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.flowConditionIsTautology(FC5));
}
TEST_F(DataflowAnalysisContextTest, EquivBoolVals) {
auto &X = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
auto &Y = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
auto &Z = A.makeAtomRef(A.makeAtom());
auto &True = A.makeLiteral(true);
auto &False = A.makeLiteral(false);
// X == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(X, X));
// X != Y
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentFormulas(X, Y));
// !X != X
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeNot(X), X));
// !(!X) = X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeNot(A.makeNot(X)), X));
// (X || X) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeOr(X, X), X));
// (X || Y) != X
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeOr(X, Y), X));
// (X || True) == True
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeOr(X, True), True));
// (X || False) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeOr(X, False), X));
// (X && X) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeAnd(X, X), X));
// (X && Y) != X
EXPECT_FALSE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeAnd(X, Y), X));
// (X && True) == X
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeAnd(X, True), X));
// (X && False) == False
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeAnd(X, False), False));
// (X || Y) == (Y || X)
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeOr(X, Y), A.makeOr(Y, X)));
// (X && Y) == (Y && X)
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeAnd(X, Y), A.makeAnd(Y, X)));
// ((X || Y) || Z) == (X || (Y || Z))
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeOr(A.makeOr(X, Y), Z),
A.makeOr(X, A.makeOr(Y, Z))));
// ((X && Y) && Z) == (X && (Y && Z))
EXPECT_TRUE(Context.equivalentFormulas(A.makeAnd(A.makeAnd(X, Y), Z),
A.makeAnd(X, A.makeAnd(Y, Z))));
}
} // namespace