At this time (immediately prior to llvm21 branching) we haven't instrumented coroutine generation to identify the "key" instructions of things like co_return and similar. This will lead to worse stepping behaviours, as there won't be any key instruction for those lines. This patch removes the key-instructions flag from the DISubprograms for coroutines, which will cause AsmPrinter to use the "old" / existing linetable stepping behaviour, avoiding a regression until we can instrument these constructs. (I'm going to post on discourse about whether this is a good idea or not in a moment)
82 lines
2.3 KiB
C++
82 lines
2.3 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -disable-llvm-optzns -std=c++20 \
|
|
// RUN: -triple=x86_64 -dwarf-version=4 -debug-info-kind=limited \
|
|
// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - %s -gkey-instructions | \
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
// Check that for the coroutine below, we mark the created DISubprogram as
|
|
// not having key instructions. This will prevent AsmPrinter from trying to
|
|
// instrument the linetable with key-instructions for source-locations in
|
|
// the coroutine scope.
|
|
//
|
|
// This is a temporary workaround for key instructions: we can instrument
|
|
// coroutine code in the future, but it hasn't been done yet.
|
|
//
|
|
// File contents copied from coro-dwarf.cpp.
|
|
|
|
namespace std {
|
|
template <typename... T> struct coroutine_traits;
|
|
|
|
template <class Promise = void> struct coroutine_handle {
|
|
coroutine_handle() = default;
|
|
static coroutine_handle from_address(void *) noexcept;
|
|
};
|
|
template <> struct coroutine_handle<void> {
|
|
static coroutine_handle from_address(void *) noexcept;
|
|
coroutine_handle() = default;
|
|
template <class PromiseType>
|
|
coroutine_handle(coroutine_handle<PromiseType>) noexcept;
|
|
};
|
|
} // namespace std
|
|
|
|
struct suspend_always {
|
|
bool await_ready() noexcept;
|
|
void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<>) noexcept;
|
|
void await_resume() noexcept;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <typename... Args> struct std::coroutine_traits<void, Args...> {
|
|
struct promise_type {
|
|
void get_return_object() noexcept;
|
|
suspend_always initial_suspend() noexcept;
|
|
suspend_always final_suspend() noexcept;
|
|
void return_void() noexcept;
|
|
promise_type();
|
|
~promise_type() noexcept;
|
|
void unhandled_exception() noexcept;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Not supported yet
|
|
struct CopyOnly {
|
|
int val;
|
|
CopyOnly(const CopyOnly &) noexcept;
|
|
CopyOnly(CopyOnly &&) = delete;
|
|
~CopyOnly();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct MoveOnly {
|
|
int val;
|
|
MoveOnly(const MoveOnly &) = delete;
|
|
MoveOnly(MoveOnly &&) noexcept;
|
|
~MoveOnly();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct MoveAndCopy {
|
|
int val;
|
|
MoveAndCopy(const MoveAndCopy &) noexcept;
|
|
MoveAndCopy(MoveAndCopy &&) noexcept;
|
|
~MoveAndCopy();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void consume(int, int, int) noexcept;
|
|
|
|
void f_coro(int val, MoveOnly moParam, MoveAndCopy mcParam) {
|
|
consume(val, moParam.val, mcParam.val);
|
|
co_return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: ![[SP:[0-9]+]] = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "f_coro", linkageName: "_Z6f_coroi8MoveOnly11MoveAndCopy"
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: keyInstructions:
|
|
// CHECK: !DIFil
|
|
|