Nikolas Klauser b6bfb199cc

[libc++] Fix {deque,vector}::append_range assuming too much about the types (#162438) ...

Currently, `deque` and `vector`'s `append_range` is implemented in terms
of `insert_range`. The problem with that is that `insert_range` has more
preconditions, resulting in us rejecting valid code.

This also significantly improves performance for `deque` in some cases.

2026-01-09 12:06:43 +01:00

..

append_range.pass.cpp

[libc++] Fix {deque,vector}::append_range assuming too much about the types (#162438)

2026-01-09 12:06:43 +01:00

assert.push_back.invalidation.pass.cpp

…

assign_range.pass.cpp

…

clear.pass.cpp

…

common.h

[libc++] Improve the test coverage for std::vector::emplace (#132440)

2025-05-06 15:29:27 -04:00

destroy_elements.pass.cpp

…

emplace_back.pass.cpp

…

emplace.pass.cpp

[libc++] Improve the test coverage for std::vector::emplace (#132440)

2025-05-06 15:29:27 -04:00

erase_iter_iter.pass.cpp

…

erase_iter.pass.cpp

…

insert_iter_initializer_list.pass.cpp

…

insert_iter_iter_iter.pass.cpp

…

insert_iter_lvalue.pass.cpp

…

insert_iter_rvalue.pass.cpp

…

insert_iter_size_value.pass.cpp

…

insert_range.pass.cpp

…

pop_back.pass.cpp

…

push_back_exception_safety.pass.cpp

…

push_back_rvalue.pass.cpp

…

push_back.pass.cpp

…

resize_not_move_insertable.verify.cpp

…