ad92174077
I noticed that I was using LLVM::VisibilityAttr::name when looking for the attribute on LLVM ops, but LLVM::VisibilityAttr::name is just "builtin.integer"... Now we switch on the types of the specific ops we would like to match, and use the getters/setters for the attribute directly instead of the deprecated setAttr/getAttr.
47 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
47 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
//===- UseDefaultVisibilityPass.cpp - Update default visibility -----------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/Transforms/UseDefaultVisibilityPass.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMAttrs.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/LLVMDialect.h"
|
|
#include "mlir/Pass/Pass.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/TypeSwitch.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace mlir {
|
|
namespace LLVM {
|
|
#define GEN_PASS_DEF_LLVMUSEDEFAULTVISIBILITYPASS
|
|
#include "mlir/Dialect/LLVMIR/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
|
|
} // namespace LLVM
|
|
} // namespace mlir
|
|
|
|
using namespace mlir;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
class UseDefaultVisibilityPass
|
|
: public LLVM::impl::LLVMUseDefaultVisibilityPassBase<
|
|
UseDefaultVisibilityPass> {
|
|
using Base::Base;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
void runOnOperation() override {
|
|
LLVM::Visibility useDefaultVisibility = useVisibility.getValue();
|
|
if (useDefaultVisibility == LLVM::Visibility::Default)
|
|
return;
|
|
Operation *op = getOperation();
|
|
op->walk([&](Operation *op) {
|
|
llvm::TypeSwitch<Operation *, void>(op)
|
|
.Case<LLVM::LLVMFuncOp, LLVM::GlobalOp, LLVM::IFuncOp, LLVM::AliasOp>(
|
|
[&](auto op) {
|
|
if (op.getVisibility_() == LLVM::Visibility::Default)
|
|
op.setVisibility_(useDefaultVisibility);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
} // namespace
|