r1025 = s/zext r1024, 4
r1026 = extract_subreg r1025, 4
to a copy:
r1026 = copy r1024
This is correct. However it uses TII->isCoalescableExtInstr() which can return
true for instructions which essentially does a sext_in_reg so this can end up
with an illegal copy where the source and destination register classes do not
match. Add a check to avoid it. Sorry, no test case possible at this time.
rdar://11849816
llvm-svn: 160059