75fdaa465f
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
llvm-svn: 67672
57 lines
954 B
C++
57 lines
954 B
C++
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
class A {
|
|
int m;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class B : public A {
|
|
public:
|
|
B() : A(), m(1), n(3.14) { }
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
int m;
|
|
float n;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
class C : public virtual B {
|
|
public:
|
|
C() : B() { }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class D : public C {
|
|
public:
|
|
D() : B(), C() { }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class E : public D, public B {
|
|
public:
|
|
E() : B(), D() { } // expected-error{{base class initializer 'B' names both a direct base class and an inherited virtual base class}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef int INT;
|
|
|
|
class F : public B {
|
|
public:
|
|
int B;
|
|
|
|
F() : B(17),
|
|
m(17), // expected-error{{member initializer 'm' does not name a non-static data member or base class}}
|
|
INT(17) // expected-error{{constructor initializer 'INT' (aka 'int') does not name a class}}
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class G : A {
|
|
G() : A(10); // expected-error{{expected '{'}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void f() : a(242) { } // expected-error{{only constructors take base initializers}}
|
|
|
|
class H : A {
|
|
H();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
H::H() : A(10) { }
|
|
|