44ecdbdc61
have a direct mismatch between some component of the template and some component of the argument. The diagnostic now says what the mismatch was, but doesn't yet say which part of the template doesn't match. llvm-svn: 174039
19 lines
910 B
C++
19 lines
910 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
// Make sure we accept this
|
|
template<class X>struct A{typedef X Y;};
|
|
template<class X>bool operator==(A<X>,typename A<X>::Y); // expected-note{{candidate template ignored: could not match 'A<type-parameter-0-0>' against 'B<int> *'}}
|
|
|
|
int a(A<int> x) { return operator==(x,1); }
|
|
|
|
int a0(A<int> x) { return x == 1; }
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: the location information for the note isn't very good
|
|
template<class X>struct B{typedef X Y;};
|
|
template<class X>bool operator==(B<X>*,typename B<X>::Y); // \
|
|
// expected-error{{overloaded 'operator==' must have at least one parameter of class or enumeration type}} \
|
|
// expected-note{{in instantiation of function template specialization}} \
|
|
// expected-note{{candidate template ignored: substitution failure [with X = int]}}
|
|
int a(B<int> x) { return operator==(&x,1); } // expected-error{{no matching function for call to 'operator=='}}
|
|
|