41a1415dc3
Instead of looking for the existence of a `ret` instruction after disassembly as a way to check that the right ISA is present in the produced binary, check instead the ELF header of the file. This is a more reliable solution, since the alternative can easily result in false positives. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149578
19 lines
560 B
Fortran
19 lines
560 B
Fortran
! Test -emit-obj (RISC-V 64)
|
|
|
|
! REQUIRES: riscv-registered-target
|
|
|
|
! RUN: %flang_fc1 -triple riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu \
|
|
! RUN: -target-feature +d -target-feature +c -emit-obj %s -o - | \
|
|
! RUN: llvm-readobj -h - | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
! RUN: %flang --target=riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu -c %s -o - | \
|
|
! RUN: llvm-readobj -h - | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
! If Flang failed to emit target-feature info, then Flags will be 0x0.
|
|
! CHECK: Arch: riscv64
|
|
! CHECK: Flags [ (0x5)
|
|
! CHECK-NEXT: EF_RISCV_FLOAT_ABI_DOUBLE (0x4)
|
|
! CHECK-NEXT: EF_RISCV_RVC (0x1)
|
|
! CHECK-NEXT: ]
|
|
end program
|