
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
39 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
39 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
|
|
// <chrono>
|
|
|
|
// constexpr hours make12(const hours& h) noexcept;
|
|
// Returns: The 12-hour equivalent of h in the range [1h, 12h].
|
|
// If h is not in the range [0h, 23h], the value returned is unspecified.
|
|
|
|
#include <chrono>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
using hours = std::chrono::hours;
|
|
ASSERT_SAME_TYPE(hours, decltype(std::chrono::make12(std::declval<hours>())));
|
|
ASSERT_NOEXCEPT( std::chrono::make12(std::declval<hours>()));
|
|
|
|
static_assert( std::chrono::make12(hours( 0)) == hours(12), "");
|
|
static_assert( std::chrono::make12(hours(11)) == hours(11), "");
|
|
static_assert( std::chrono::make12(hours(12)) == hours(12), "");
|
|
static_assert( std::chrono::make12(hours(23)) == hours(11), "");
|
|
|
|
assert( std::chrono::make12(hours(0)) == hours(12));
|
|
for (int i = 1; i < 13; ++i)
|
|
assert( std::chrono::make12(hours(i)) == hours(i));
|
|
for (int i = 13; i < 24; ++i)
|
|
assert( std::chrono::make12(hours(i)) == hours(i-12));
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|