31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
39 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
39 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// This test should pass in C++03 with Clang extensions because Clang does
|
|
// not implicitly delete the copy constructor when move constructors are
|
|
// defaulted using extensions.
|
|
|
|
// XFAIL: c++03
|
|
|
|
// test move
|
|
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
struct move_only {
|
|
move_only() {}
|
|
move_only(move_only&&) = default;
|
|
move_only& operator=(move_only&&) = default;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
move_only source() {return move_only();}
|
|
const move_only csource() {return move_only();}
|
|
|
|
void test(move_only) {}
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
const move_only ca = move_only();
|
|
// expected-error@+1 {{call to implicitly-deleted copy constructor of 'move_only'}}
|
|
test(std::move(ca));
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|