
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
34 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
34 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
// -*- C++ -*-
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14
|
|
|
|
// <variant>
|
|
|
|
// LWG issue 3024
|
|
|
|
#include <variant>
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
|
|
struct NotCopyConstructible
|
|
{
|
|
NotCopyConstructible() = default;
|
|
NotCopyConstructible(NotCopyConstructible const&) = delete;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
static_assert(!std::is_copy_constructible_v<NotCopyConstructible>);
|
|
|
|
std::variant<NotCopyConstructible> v;
|
|
std::variant<NotCopyConstructible> v1;
|
|
std::variant<NotCopyConstructible> v2(v); // expected-error {{call to implicitly-deleted copy constructor of 'std::variant<NotCopyConstructible>'}}
|
|
v1 = v; // expected-error-re {{object of type 'std:{{.*}}:variant<NotCopyConstructible>' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted}}
|
|
}
|