31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
43 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
43 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// <tuple>
|
|
|
|
// template <class... Types> class tuple;
|
|
|
|
// ~tuple();
|
|
|
|
// C++17 added:
|
|
// The destructor of tuple shall be a trivial destructor
|
|
// if (is_trivially_destructible_v<Types> && ...) is true.
|
|
|
|
#include <tuple>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
static_assert(std::is_trivially_destructible<
|
|
std::tuple<> >::value, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::is_trivially_destructible<
|
|
std::tuple<void*> >::value, "");
|
|
static_assert(std::is_trivially_destructible<
|
|
std::tuple<int, float> >::value, "");
|
|
static_assert(!std::is_trivially_destructible<
|
|
std::tuple<std::string> >::value, "");
|
|
static_assert(!std::is_trivially_destructible<
|
|
std::tuple<int, std::string> >::value, "");
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|