This reverts commit d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d. This commit wasn't reviewed ahead of time and significant concerns were raised immediately after it landed. According to our developer policy this warrants immediate revert of the commit. https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155509
214 lines
3.5 KiB
C
214 lines
3.5 KiB
C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-unknown-unknown -O3 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
int foo(int i) {
|
|
int j = 0;
|
|
switch (i) {
|
|
case -1:
|
|
j = 1; break;
|
|
case 1 :
|
|
j = 2; break;
|
|
case 2:
|
|
j = 3; break;
|
|
default:
|
|
j = 42; break;
|
|
}
|
|
j = j + 1;
|
|
return j;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int foo2(int i) {
|
|
int j = 0;
|
|
switch (i) {
|
|
case 1 :
|
|
j = 2; break;
|
|
case 2 ... 10:
|
|
j = 3; break;
|
|
default:
|
|
j = 42; break;
|
|
}
|
|
j = j + 1;
|
|
return j;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int foo3(int i) {
|
|
int j = 0;
|
|
switch (i) {
|
|
default:
|
|
j = 42; break;
|
|
case 111:
|
|
j = 111; break;
|
|
case 0 ... 100:
|
|
j = 1; break;
|
|
case 222:
|
|
j = 222; break;
|
|
}
|
|
return j;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int foo4(int i) {
|
|
int j = 0;
|
|
switch (i) {
|
|
case 111:
|
|
j = 111; break;
|
|
case 0 ... 100:
|
|
j = 1; break;
|
|
case 222:
|
|
j = 222; break;
|
|
default:
|
|
j = 42; break;
|
|
case 501 ... 600:
|
|
j = 5; break;
|
|
}
|
|
return j;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @foo4t()
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 376
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
int foo4t(void) {
|
|
// 111 + 1 + 222 + 42 = 376
|
|
return foo4(111) + foo4(99) + foo4(222) + foo4(601);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @foo5()
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: switch
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
void foo5(void){
|
|
switch(0){
|
|
default:
|
|
if (0) {
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @foo6()
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: switch
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
void foo6(void){
|
|
switch(0){
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @foo7()
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: switch
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
void foo7(void){
|
|
switch(0){
|
|
foo7();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @f8(
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 3
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
int f8(unsigned x) {
|
|
switch(x) {
|
|
default:
|
|
return 3;
|
|
case 0xFFFFFFFF ... 1: // This range should be empty because x is unsigned.
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ensure that default after a case range is not ignored.
|
|
//
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @f9()
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 10
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
static int f9_0(unsigned x) {
|
|
switch(x) {
|
|
case 10 ... 0xFFFFFFFF:
|
|
return 0;
|
|
default:
|
|
return 10;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
int f9(void) {
|
|
return f9_0(2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ensure that this doesn't compile to infinite loop in g() due to
|
|
// miscompilation of fallthrough from default to a (tested) case
|
|
// range.
|
|
//
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @f10()
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 10
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
static int f10_0(unsigned x) {
|
|
switch(x) {
|
|
default:
|
|
x += 1;
|
|
case 10 ... 0xFFFFFFFF:
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int f10(void) {
|
|
f10_0(1);
|
|
return 10;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This generated incorrect code because of poor switch chaining.
|
|
//
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @f11(
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 3
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
int f11(int x) {
|
|
switch(x) {
|
|
default:
|
|
return 3;
|
|
case 10 ... 0xFFFFFFFF:
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This just asserted because of the way case ranges were calculated.
|
|
//
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @f12(
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 3
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
int f12(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) {
|
|
default:
|
|
return 3;
|
|
case 10 ... -1:
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Make sure return is not constant (if empty range is skipped or miscompiled)
|
|
//
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @f13(
|
|
// CHECK: ret i32 %
|
|
// CHECK: }
|
|
int f13(unsigned x) {
|
|
switch(x) {
|
|
case 2:
|
|
// fallthrough empty range
|
|
case 10 ... 9:
|
|
return 10;
|
|
default:
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Don't delete a basic block that we want to introduce later references to.
|
|
// This isn't really specific to switches, but it's easy to show with them.
|
|
// rdar://problem/8837067
|
|
int f14(int x) {
|
|
switch (x) {
|
|
|
|
// case range so that the case block has no predecessors
|
|
case 0 ... 15:
|
|
// any expression which doesn't introduce a new block
|
|
(void) 0;
|
|
// kaboom
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return x;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|