Louis Dionne 31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00

71 lines
1.6 KiB
C++

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-has-no-threads
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
// <future>
// class packaged_task<R(ArgTypes...)>
// future<R> get_future();
#include <future>
#include <cassert>
#include "test_macros.h"
class A
{
long data_;
public:
explicit A(long i) : data_(i) {}
long operator()(long i, long j) const {return data_ + i + j;}
};
int main(int, char**)
{
{
std::packaged_task<double(int, char)> p(A(5));
std::future<double> f = p.get_future();
p(3, 'a');
assert(f.get() == 105.0);
}
#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
{
std::packaged_task<double(int, char)> p(A(5));
std::future<double> f = p.get_future();
try
{
f = p.get_future();
assert(false);
}
catch (const std::future_error& e)
{
assert(e.code() == make_error_code(std::future_errc::future_already_retrieved));
}
}
{
std::packaged_task<double(int, char)> p;
try
{
std::future<double> f = p.get_future();
assert(false);
}
catch (const std::future_error& e)
{
assert(e.code() == make_error_code(std::future_errc::no_state));
}
}
#endif
return 0;
}